On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
> I see. So I agree with you Gonzalo, let's not complicate it. Daniel
> patch is good enough.
Yes, I like the simplicity as well.
I updated my old feature page with the new version to do this 'officially':
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Feat
On 4 July 2013 19:11, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Question:
>
> Is possible do a branch 'F18' or similar, before doing more changes,
> then who need work on this distro, like the people maintaining the actual
> images
> in the xos, can use that branch?
>
The main issue is that changes in sugar-* mig
Question:
Is possible do a branch 'F18' or similar, before doing more changes,
then who need work on this distro, like the people maintaining the actual
images
in the xos, can use that branch?
Gonzalo
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> So, what I need if we want to keep
Ok :)
Thx
2013/7/4 Daniel Drake
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez
> wrote:
> > Trying to run an activity (Jukebox) in GTK3...
> > (Os: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring, 32bits)
>
> You need to update your sugar-toolkit-gtk3 for compatibility with the
> new pygobject3 version you are runni
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote:
> Trying to run an activity (Jukebox) in GTK3...
> (Os: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring, 32bits)
You need to update your sugar-toolkit-gtk3 for compatibility with the
new pygobject3 version you are running.
Daniel
_
So, what I need if we want to keep Fedora 18 support is a volunteer to
* Maintain the Fedora 18 specific bits of the sugar-build configuration.
* Maintain the Fedora 18 buildbot instance.
* Answer bug reports about sugar-build on Fedora 18.
If anyone is interested please let me know!
I was helping Aleksey debug some ASLO fine-tuning. This version is the
same as 47.
-walter
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> What is this version?
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Sugar Labs Activities
> wrote:
>>
>> Activity Homepage:
>> http://activities
Thanks for tracking this down Miguel. I think it make sense to have our own
parser then. In general I'm happy with the general design of the patch. I
will comment on the details in the review.
On 4 July 2013 13:02, Miguel González wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrot
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> did we check what is parsing serviceproviders.xml in GNOME? It doesn't
> seem to be ModemManager so maybe it's not something we can reuse but I'd
> rather make sure before going with our own parser.
>
> AFAIK, the Service Provider D
Hi,
did we check what is parsing serviceproviders.xml in GNOME? It doesn't seem
to be ModemManager so maybe it's not something we can reuse but I'd rather
make sure before going with our own parser.
On 2 July 2013 22:49, Miguel González wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just send a pull request with the
What is this version?
Gonzalo
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Sugar Labs Activities <
activit...@sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> Activity Homepage:
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4197
>
> Sugar Platform:
> 0.82 - 0.100
>
> Download Now:
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28680/me
11 matches
Mail list logo
