Peter, is it possible to get 3.0 in Fedora 19 now that the issue is solved?
I've seen the change in git but I don't see an rpm, not even in
updates-testing. (Hopefully it's not just me being a bit clueless about
Fedora...).
On 1 November 2013 21:39, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
In Flavio's defense, I'd like to restructure this conversation.
Undoubtedly, he's put great effort in this work.
From a deployment's point of view, it's a contribution.
From Gonzalo's POV, it's a burden because Flavio hasn't taken up
learning to master Git.
From Localizer's POV it's a burden
El 17/11/13 12:38, Sebastian Silva escribió:
I spent the last month trying to get mantainers to respond to
requests to update
GTK2 branches with translations, with barely any response except Manuq
and Gonzalo,
and only the first actually took action on my request.
BTW, in our latest public
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Sebastian Silva
sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:
In Flavio's defense, I'd like to restructure this conversation.
Undoubtedly, he's put great effort in this work.
And there are mechanisms for incorporating that work for the benefit of all.
From a deployment's
Sebastian,
I think you are not understanding the problem.
Of course, anybody can fork and upload another activity, but that is
nightmare
on the long run, to maintainers and to users.
Imagine how good for users will be have different versions of the
activities,
some running, some not, depending
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Sebastian Silva
sebast...@fuentelibre.orgwrote:
El 17/11/13 12:38, Sebastian Silva escribió:
I spent the last month trying to get mantainers to respond to requests
to update
GTK2 branches with translations, with barely any response except Manuq and
Gonzalo,
On 17 November 2013 18:38, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.orgwrote:
In Flavio's defense, I'd like to restructure this conversation.
Undoubtedly, he's put great effort in this work.
I suspect it's a great contribution, which is exactly why I'm mad it's not
going upstream...
In my
On 17 November 2013 18:58, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Sebastian Silva
sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:
El 17/11/13 12:38, Sebastian Silva escribió:
I spent the last month trying to get mantainers to respond to requests
to update
GTK2
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2013 18:58, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Sebastian Silva
sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:
El 17/11/13 12:38, Sebastian Silva escribió:
I spent the
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter, is it possible to get 3.0 in Fedora 19 now that the issue is solved?
I've seen the change in git but I don't see an rpm, not even in
updates-testing. (Hopefully it's not just me being a bit clueless about
On 17 November 2013 19:20, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Like I see it, is not a fork.
Sebastian said he don't want make changes in the activities,
only want add translation files, and package them in a xo file.
If someone needs to package gtk2 activities, how they will know they
On 17 November 2013 19:21, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Peter, is it possible to get 3.0 in Fedora 19 now that the issue is
solved?
I've seen the change in git but I don't see an rpm, not even in
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2013 19:21, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Peter, is it possible to get 3.0 in Fedora 19 now that the issue is
On 17 November 2013 19:33, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Otherwise I suppose it might make sense to move sugar-build to F20 at this
point, I suppose it's not horribly unstable these days...
Well maybe not a great idea given Google Code-In is starting soon.
Hello,
does anyone have strong opinions on when we should switch sugar-build to
use Fedora 20?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule
I was sort of considering to do it now, to make Write work. It should be
pretty stable, especially since we don't use kernel, X server etc.
As far
El 17/11/13 13:12, Daniel Narvaez escribió:
I spent the last month trying to get mantainers to respond to
requests to update
GTK2 branches with translations, with barely any response except
Manuq and Gonzalo,
and only the first actually took action on my request.
I think
El 17/11/13 13:20, Gonzalo Odiard escribió:
Sebastian said he don't want make changes in the activities,
only want add translation files, and package them in a xo file.
Actually I was very specific in stating what I needed was to have
updated .xo bundles in ASLO.
Sebastian
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 07:45:08 PM Daniel Narvaez wrote:
As far as I know no one is working on F19 based stuff (?). Mostly worried
about Google Code-In. I suppose better to do it before or after it.
This might cause regressions. I think it will be better to do it after the
contest so the
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Daniel Francis fran...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 07:45:08 PM Daniel Narvaez wrote:
As far as I know no one is working on F19 based stuff (?). Mostly worried
about Google Code-In. I suppose better to do it before or after it.
This might
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2013 19:33, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Otherwise I suppose it might make sense to move sugar-build to F20 at this
point, I suppose it's not horribly unstable these days...
Well maybe not
On 17 November 2013 20:02, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.orgwrote:
El 17/11/13 13:12, Daniel Narvaez escribió:
I spent the last month trying to get mantainers to respond to requests
to update
GTK2 branches with translations, with barely any response except Manuq
and Gonzalo,
and
Hi All,
Just a reminder that SoaS v10 beta [1] is out for both x86 and ARM and
testing and feedback would be absolutely fabulous. I believe it's one
of our strongest and best releases to date.
Just a few minor issues to report with 0.100 on Fedora 20.
Firstly the in About Computer it's still
Hi Peter,
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 19:33 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
Just a reminder that SoaS v10 beta [1] is out for both x86 and ARM and
testing and feedback would be absolutely fabulous. I believe it's one
of our strongest and best releases to date.
Just a few minor issues to
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 19:33 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
Just a reminder that SoaS v10 beta [1] is out for both x86 and ARM and
testing and feedback would be absolutely fabulous. I believe it's one
of our
Hi everyone!
I am thinking in add this feature to Jukebox [1], in the next days for GCI
2013, but I need some tips about how implementing it (design).
Some time ago I did some similar for Chart [2], with two simple arrow
buttons [3] that work with the selected item.
But in Jukebox, when you
On 17 November 2013 20:33, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Just a reminder that SoaS v10 beta [1] is out for both x86 and ARM and
testing and feedback would be absolutely fabulous. I believe it's one
of our strongest and best releases to date.
Awesome!
Just a few
On 17 November 2013 21:52, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I made a patches to hide those. I submitted the sugar part for review
Argh, sent accidentally...
I submitted the sugar part for review
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/125
I will push the (trivial) sugar-runner part
On 17 November 2013 20:25, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 17 November 2013 19:33, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Otherwise I suppose it might make sense to move sugar-build to F20 at
this
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 06:52:26AM -0800, Alan Aguiar wrote:
I was seeing this wiki entry: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/
ProtoSnap_Contributors_Guide
I have contributed there.
And see that it uses Arduino plugin. I'm mantaining this plugin for
TurtleBlocks (AKA TurtleArt) and the version showed
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 20:28 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 19:33 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
Secondly, a minor annoyance with sugar-runner is that the shutdown
and reboot options in the
On 17 November 2013 23:13, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 20:28 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 19:33 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
Secondly, a minor annoyance
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 23:21 +0100, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure to understand your concern. We default to true, so keep
the same behavior. sugar-runner will set the environment variables to
no disabling the items only for sugar-runner and not when running
from gdm.
Can you
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 06:34:49 PM Agustin Zubiaga Sanchez wrote:
So, what can I do?
Use double-click to play the track and implement that feature like in
Chart, or do something like drag and drop (I think it isn't a good idea)?
I want you opinions :)
Sugar was one of the first
Yes, that's true...It will look strange but is better than double-click.
Thank you Daniel,
aguz
2013/11/17 Daniel Francis fran...@sugarlabs.org
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 06:34:49 PM Agustin Zubiaga Sanchez wrote:
So, what can I do?
Use double-click to play the track and implement that
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 08:49:41 +1100
From: qu...@laptop.org
To: alan...@gmail.com
CC: unleashk...@googlegroups.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: [UKids] ProtoSnap with Arduino plugin
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 06:52:26AM -0800, Alan Aguiar wrote:
I was seeing this wiki
Alan Aguiar wrote:
James Cameron wrote:
Alan Aguiar wrote:
I was seeing this wiki entry: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/
ProtoSnap_Contributors_Guide
I have contributed there.
And see that it uses Arduino plugin. I'm mantaining this plugin
for TurtleBlocks (AKA TurtleArt) and the
+1
In theory, reorder in the treeview could be enabled and drag drop should
work.
Gonzalo
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Agustin Zubiaga Sanchez a...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
Yes, that's true...It will look strange but is better than double-click.
Thank you Daniel,
aguz
2013/11/17
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2013 20:33, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Just a reminder that SoaS v10 beta [1] is out for both x86 and ARM and
testing and feedback would be absolutely fabulous. I believe it's
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2013 20:33, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Just a reminder that SoaS v10 beta [1] is out for both x86 and
39 matches
Mail list logo
