Re: [Sugar-devel] Collaboration support for sugar web activities

2014-01-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Thinking aloud here really. If the approach you took is less work then making a separate framework, doing presence only with telepathy might be a good first step. But I'd rather go in the direction of both python and js activities doing collaboration through a WebSocket server then trying to use t

Re: [Sugar-devel] Collaboration support for sugar web activities

2014-01-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hi Emil, first of all, I think having collaboration in sugar-web would be more than awesome, and I like the idea of using TogetherJS. The main question to me seems that of the interaction with the existing telepathy stuff. I must say I'm not very familiar with it, but it's known to not be reliabl

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk 3.10 icon size regression

2014-01-10 Thread Ignacio Rodríguez
We need to test it on "old" versions. I think it works on all versions :) 2014/1/10, Daniel Narvaez : > Whoa scary amount of changes! I hope it might be possible to reduce them, > for example we could change Icon to handle icon_size in a backward > compatible way. > > Though I think we really need

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk 3.10 icon size regression

2014-01-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Whoa scary amount of changes! I hope it might be possible to reduce them, for example we could change Icon to handle icon_size in a backward compatible way. Though I think we really need to see a grep on Gonzalo collection of all the activities, to be able to decide the best strategy. Thanks agai

Re: [Sugar-devel] Collaboration support for sugar web activities

2014-01-10 Thread Code Raguet
Hi, Emil. Awesome work! I'd like to collaborate with the collaboration.js API design and implementation. I'll ping at IRC On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Emil Dudev wrote: > After a lot of debugging of javascript, I'm finally able to show a small > preview of what TogetherJS will look like.

Re: [Sugar-devel] The quest for data

2014-01-10 Thread Sameer Verma
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Martin Dluhos wrote: > On 7.1.2014 01:49, Sameer Verma wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Martin Dluhos wrote: >>> For visualization, I have explored using LibreOffice and SOFA, but neither >>> of >>> those were flexible to allow for customization of the

Re: [Sugar-devel] The quest for data

2014-01-10 Thread Sameer Verma
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Anish Mangal wrote: > Sorry for being late to the party. Clearly the "quest for data" is a > commonly shared one, with many different approaches, questions, and > reporting/results. > > One of the already mentioned solutions is the sugar-stats package, > originally

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk 3.10 icon size regression

2014-01-10 Thread Ignacio Rodríguez
Please review: https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/pull/86 and https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/208 2014/1/10, Ignacio Rodríguez : >> I think we are safe in activities. I will look at Browse. > > No, this is a "global" problem, just now, I'm removing all IconSizes from >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Collaboration support for sugar web activities

2014-01-10 Thread Emil Dudev
After a lot of debugging of javascript, I'm finally able to show a small preview of what TogetherJS will look like. The branches will be at the bottom. For testing purposes I've chosen the Get Things Done web activity. The first thing I added to GTD was colors, so entries by different users can be

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk 3.10 icon size regression

2014-01-10 Thread Ignacio Rodríguez
> I think we are safe in activities. I will look at Browse. No, this is a "global" problem, just now, I'm removing all IconSizes from core. 2014/1/10, Manuel Quiñones : > Thanks Ignacio and Daniel for taking action. > > I think we are safe in activities. I will look at Browse. > > > 2014/1/10 I

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk 3.10 icon size regression

2014-01-10 Thread Manuel Quiñones
Thanks Ignacio and Daniel for taking action. I think we are safe in activities. I will look at Browse. 2014/1/10 Ignacio Rodríguez > Just now: > > [image: Imágenes integradas 1] > > Working on bugs. > BTW, gtk2 activities aren't this problem. > Saludos. > Ignacio Rodríguez > > > 2014/1/10 Gon

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk 3.10 icon size regression

2014-01-10 Thread Ignacio Rodríguez
Just now: [image: Imágenes integradas 1] Working on bugs. BTW, gtk2 activities aren't this problem. Saludos. Ignacio Rodríguez 2014/1/10 Gonzalo Odiard > >> For ToolButton the fix should be easy, we just make the Icon >> STANDARD_ICON_SIZE. But there might be other cases where these propertie

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unable to commit on my gitorious sugar lab account

2014-01-10 Thread laurent bernabe
Hello, Thank you for your answer. I've found the problem yesterday : I was trying to push sources from inside the Sugar Shell (./osbuild shell). I managed to push by exiting Sugar shell and pushing from the right directory. Regards 2014/1/10 Aleksey Lim > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 08:50:16AM +0

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk 3.10 icon size regression

2014-01-10 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
> > > For ToolButton the fix should be easy, we just make the Icon > STANDARD_ICON_SIZE. But there might be other cases where these properties > was used. Hopefully activities are not using Gtk.IconSize directly... > Perhaps you could grep? :) > > I can search later. Anyway should be only activitie

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk 3.10 icon size regression

2014-01-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
sugar-artwork installs a settings.ini like this -- [Settings] gtk-auto-mnemonics = 1 gtk-menu-images = 1 gtk-button-images = 1 gtk-toolbar-style = GTK_TOOLBAR_ICONS gtk-cursor-theme-name = sugar gtk-primary-button-warps-slider = 0 gtk-icon-sizes = gtk-menu=33,33:gtk-dnd=33,33:gtk-small-toolbar=3

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gtk 3.10 icon size regression

2014-01-10 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
I don't understand what is the problem or the use case. Could you explain? Gonzalo On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hi, > > so, it looks like the GtkSettings icon sizes are ignored with 3.10 > (intentionally deprecated). As far as I can tell the default sizes are now >

[Sugar-devel] Gtk 3.10 icon size regression

2014-01-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hi, so, it looks like the GtkSettings icon sizes are ignored with 3.10 (intentionally deprecated). As far as I can tell the default sizes are now just hardcoded. So I think the only way is to pass the size explicitly to Icon. Ignacio is trying to do that in ToolButton, I do wonder if there are oth

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unable to commit on my gitorious sugar lab account

2014-01-10 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 08:50:16AM +0100, laurent bernabe wrote: > Hello everyone, > > though I have just generated a new rsa keys pair, and gave the public one > to my gitorious sugarlab account, I got several into the following error : > > ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fedora repository with snapshots from git

2014-01-10 Thread Code Raguet
thanks! On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Thinking again about your cross compilation idea in irc, I remembered that > the building is actually relatively fast (because sugar compiled code is so > little). What takes time is mock setting up a chroot. Which is nice for > bu

Re: [Sugar-devel] The quest for data

2014-01-10 Thread Martin Abente
+1 On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Martin Dluhos wrote: > On 10.1.2014 11:55, Anish Mangal wrote: > > Sorry for being late to the party. Clearly the "quest for data" is a > commonly > > shared one, with many different approaches, questions, and > reporting/results. > > > > One of the already m

Re: [Sugar-devel] The quest for data

2014-01-10 Thread Martin Dluhos
On 10.1.2014 11:55, Anish Mangal wrote: > Sorry for being late to the party. Clearly the "quest for data" is a commonly > shared one, with many different approaches, questions, and reporting/results. > > One of the already mentioned solutions is the sugar-stats package, originally > developed by A

Re: [Sugar-devel] The quest for data

2014-01-10 Thread Martin Dluhos
On 7.1.2014 01:49, Sameer Verma wrote: > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Martin Dluhos wrote: >> For visualization, I have explored using LibreOffice and SOFA, but neither of >> those were flexible to allow for customization of the output beyond some a >> few >> rudimentary options, so I started