Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)

2014-05-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I built an image for 1.75 http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/ I've not been able to test yet. I don't have my usual usb stick with me and having troubles finding something the XO likes. On 8 May 2014 02:04, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: As an update, I have patched

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)

2014-05-09 Thread Daniel Drake
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: [...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good enough introspection to make

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)

2014-05-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 9 May 2014 14:24, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: [...] And with the XO stuck on

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)

2014-05-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: [...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good enough introspection to make the port compatible with it. If anybody would like to work on moving olpc-os-builder to something more recent, feel free. It isn't

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)

2014-05-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 9 May 2014 15:50, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: [...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good enough introspection to make the port compatible with it. If anybody would like to work on

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)

2014-05-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I built a xo4 image, which like 1.75 boots fine into sugar http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/xo4/ The main problem, as discussed, is that firmwares are not loaded. I'm building a systemd rpm with firmware loading enabled. If we can get wifi working then it should be easier to play with

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)

2014-05-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
By the way, I suspect the issue with small icons is something we already fixed in 0.101. As soon as we have the base system working decently I'm planning to make builds with latest sugar from git. On 10 May 2014 01:22, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: I built a xo4 image, which like

[Sugar-devel] Automated XO builds

2014-05-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, I would like to setup automated XO images builds based on F20, the official OLPC kernel and sugar from git. I think we have most of the bits in place to do that, except for a decent ARM machine. The VM I'm using is really really too slow, it takes like 10 hours to complete an

Re: [Sugar-devel] Automated XO builds

2014-05-09 Thread James Cameron
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OS_Builder/Run_on_XO_hardware may be of use, for ideas. There are some feature removals that may help, like olpc-update, [usb-update], and versioned filesystem. Some of the costly steps are architecture independent; e.g. the zhashfs compression could be done on a faster