Re: [Sugar-devel] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-08 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 07:35:34PM -0400, Kevin Gordon Gmail wrote: > Perhaps silly Q... > > Any benefit just putting swap and static content on the SD? No question is silly. ;-) I'm guessing you are asking about performance, or response times. If so, the short answer is no. Details below. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-08 Thread James Cameron
What benefit is an SD card on an XO-1? My tests of about 400 starts show some benefit of using an SD card, on activity startup time. The benefits are: - boot time was decreased by several seconds; because of reduced demand for memory, - first activity start after boot was decreased by several

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development meeting, road to 106 #2

2015-04-08 Thread James Cameron
I propose for 0.106 removing any WebKit1 dependency, instead moving affected components to WebKit2. This will reduce dependencies, which makes downstream work slightly smaller. However, I'm not offering to do the task; planning horizon too short. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-08 Thread Peter Robinson
>> On 07/04/15 22:47, James Cameron wrote: >> > The testing scripts can be made available if anybody else would >> > like to replicate the results. >> >> I'd be curious to look at your scripts and try to replicate some >> results with our builds. > > git clone git://dev.laptop.org/users/quozl/test-

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

2015-04-08 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, The Fedora 22 Beta RC is out, would be great to get some testing on SoAS/Sugar 0.104 -- Forwarded message -- From: Adam Williamson Date: Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:04 AM Subject: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now! To: test-annou...@lists.fedora