-Original Message-
From: qu...@laptop.org [mailto:qu...@laptop.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:48 AM
To: Tim Moody
Cc: 'Adam Holt'; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: webm woes
summary: you have a failing video _player_ app, not a failing _video_.
OK. I thought
Hi Aneesh,
I maintain Sugar packaging of Sugar for Debian, and noticed that in the
Calculate activity you've declared copyright for layout.py but not
included a license.
Please always include an explicit license statement where a copyright is
stated, because a lack of license statement does
Hello Jonas,
Thanks for taking the time to let us know. The new maintainer of Calculate
is Gonzalo (cc'ed).
For future reference, you can check this [1] list to see who is currently
maintaining an activity (we certainly need to improve our communication
channels).
Regards,
Martin.
[1]
Hi Martin (and cc others - also alternate address for Aneesh),
Quoting Martin Abente (2015-06-18 12:58:48)
Thanks for taking the time to let us know. The new maintainer of
Calculate is Gonzalo (cc'ed).
For future reference, you can check this [1] list to see who is
currently maintaining an
In our project, is a common practice include a COPYING file in the activity
directory.
Include the text on every file does not have sense for us,
more thinking we still support old devices with few storage space, as the
XO-1.
Could you clarify what are you asking for, specifically, please?
In the
Hi Gonzalo,
Quoting Gonzalo Odiard (2015-06-18 13:33:57)
In our project, is a common practice include a COPYING file in the
activity directory.
Include the text on every file does not have sense for us, more
thinking we still support old devices with few storage space, as the
XO-1.
I am afraid you will find many other activities where the license notation
is
in the same state.
If the current maintainer can't solve the problem, I have nothing to do,
but then don't complain :)
Gonzalo
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:39 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
I'm with Jonas on
I'm with Jonas on this.
The fault is a copyright statement in a work without a license, and
yes, only the original copyright owner can correct it.
In my opinion, that correction can be a mail reply from the original
copyright owner saying Gonzalo, please add this license short text,
or Gonzalo,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 09:27:51AM -0400, Tim Moody wrote:
summary: you have a failing video _player_ app, not a failing
_video_.
OK. I thought maybe it was a variant mp4, but I see that you are
right. It is the browser support for the page not the codec.
To be clear, I am using browse
If you can't read HTML, drive wget, and host the files, find someone on
XSCE
to help you?
sure.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Just for reference, we started to port Browse to WebKit2
on the webkit2 branch
https://github.com/sugarlabs/browse-activity/tree/webkit2
If you want to test, is a option, but still need a lot of work until will
be on par with the webkitgtk version.
In particular, some api we need is not available
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:17:50PM -0400, Tim Moody wrote:
yum -y install gstreamer1-libav gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-extras
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld gstreamer1-plugins-base-tools
gstreamer1-plugins-good-extras gstreamer1-plugins-ugly
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
summary: you have a failing video _player_ app, not a failing _video_.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 03:51:22PM -0400, Tim Moody wrote:
on an XO4 with 32016r4 I install
you are testing sugar-0.104.1 with browse-157 on an xo-4.
. gstreamer1-plugins-vmeta-0.0.20130822-1.fc18.armv7hl.rpm
.
13 matches
Mail list logo
