Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-install-bundle in 13.2.5 is slooow

2015-08-29 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi, Sam P. The logs are not interesting, only the unzip list of files. The second test used time.time() in sugar-install-bundle. It is going through the bundle registry. There is an else option. Perhaps I should try the installs with that branch. Tony On 08/29/2015 12:17 PM, Sam P. wrote:

[Sugar-devel] Sugar-install-bundle in 13.2.5 is slooow

2015-08-29 Thread Tony Anderson
I use sugar-install-bundle to update the configuration of Sugar activities when preparing laptops at deployments. With 13.2.5, this script is taking 3-4 times as long as with previous releases. I can only speculate on the difference in times since I have 13.2.5 on all the available XOs and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-install-bundle in 13.2.5 is slooow

2015-08-29 Thread Sam P.
Hi Tony, Do you have the logs of these installs? Is there anything in the logs? Looking back at the commit logs, the change in 0.104 was to use the bundle registry to install bundles if sugar is running [1]. Maybe that has done something or maybe it is a different change down the line!

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-install-bundle in 13.2.5 is slooow

2015-08-29 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi, I reran the installs with SUGAR_PROFILE set to False. The install timings: Browse: 0.5 seconds Jukebox: 0.5 seconds Quiz: 0.8 seconds I'll just patch sugar-install-bundle not to use the SUGAR_PROFILE path. Thanks for the help. Tony On 08/29/2015 01:41 PM, James Cameron wrote: G'day

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Flappy Birds-1

2015-08-29 Thread James Cameron
Heh. No, not dismissive. I made a thorough review and yet the code in git hasn't changed, and no new release. Makes me look silly, that's all. ;-) What was I thinking to spend so much time on it before checking if review could be used? I'm okay with over-the-wall development, where no review

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-install-bundle in 13.2.5 is slooow

2015-08-29 Thread Jerry Vonau
Hi Tony, I brought concerns about that change, with regards to OSbuilder but I guess that change is slowing down the console now. Have you tried TinyCore[1] that would boot without setting having SUGAR_PROFILE. I've used TinyCore to install activities in the past, checkout XO.custom in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-install-bundle in 13.2.5 is slooow

2015-08-29 Thread James Cameron
G'day Sam, My guess is #4849 again and our user hasn't unset the SUGAR_PROFILE environment variable as was suggested four months ago. I never heard closure on the suggestion, but as it was off-list I'm not surprised. The ticket shows how to reproduce in case you'd like to take a stab at it. --

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-install-bundle in 13.2.5 is slooow

2015-08-29 Thread Sam P.
Hi Tony, Should we make disabling install via bundle registry (SUGAR_PROFILE) a flag? There are use cases when it makes sense to install via bundle registry (updating the activity list) so it is not good to outright disable it. Thanks, Sam On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 11:51 pm Tony Anderson

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-install-bundle in 13.2.5 is slooow

2015-08-29 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi, Sam The script that installs these activities is run after flashing the laptop to provide the capabilities needed for the laptop to work with the school server. The goal is to have each laptop in the deployment with identical software. In this case, the script finishes by a poweroff