[Sugar-devel] Tux4kids needs a hero! (Tuxmath, TuxType, etc.)

Everybody knows TuxMath and some knows the Tux4Kids suite: https://tux4kids.alioth.debian.org It is packaged as a Sugar activity here: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4271 At OLPC France, we recently hit a bug, and while reporting it, we discovered that the Tux4Kids is largely

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Display clock in frame

Hi, It seems that someone had already submitted a patch for the frame clock -> http://www.mail-archive.com/sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg03934.html. Then why isn't it yet implemented in Sugar? Thanks, Utkarsh Tiwari On 4/11/16, James Cameron wrote: > Thanks for offering to work on thes

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] Action needed on two issues

Adam, Am not sure how the Conservancy can help us get better if we don't have our financial policies well defined. According to the published numbers (I'm attaching a Spreadsheet with the information published by you) for the last 4 years, ~80% (USD$26,400) of expenses are related to promotional

Re: [Sugar-devel] The future of Sugar on XO-1s

On 8 April 2016 at 09:26, Walter Bender wrote: > the XO-4 was the machine we aspired to build in 2006-7 That's a powerful quote, I think :) But it seems premature for use of the past-tense - XO-4s are available today brand new in modest quantities. Or do you think there is a need for an XO-5 w

Re: [Sugar-devel] [UKids] Re: The future of Sugar on XO-1s

Hi Adam On 10 April 2016 at 22:05, Adam Holt wrote: > On Apr 10, 2016 9:37 PM, "Dave Crossland" wrote: > > > > On 10 April 2016 at 20:35, Adam Holt wrote: > >> > >> Just imagine if OLPC had not chosen to run off with $40 Millon in > community-driven revenue > > > > I don't understand this. Wha

Re: [Sugar-devel] [UKids] Re: The future of Sugar on XO-1s

On Apr 10, 2016 9:37 PM, "Dave Crossland" wrote: > > On 10 April 2016 at 20:35, Adam Holt wrote: >> >> Just imagine if OLPC had not chosen to run off with $40 Millon in community-driven revenue > > I don't understand this. What are you referring to? :) Give1Get1 revenues were approximately $40 M

Re: [Sugar-devel] The future of Sugar on XO-1s

Hi James! Brilliant answer, thank you :) On 10 April 2016 at 18:26, James Cameron wrote: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 08:47:35AM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote: > > > > On 9 April 2016 at 06:31, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > > The XO-4 is in production. > > > > What's the minim

Re: [Sugar-devel] [UKids] Re: The future of Sugar on XO-1s

On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 09:36:50PM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote: > > On 10 April 2016 at 20:35, Adam Holt <[1]h...@laptop.org> wrote: > > Just imagine if OLPC had not chosen to run off with $40 Millon in > community-driven revenue > > I don't understand this. What are you referring to? :)

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Display clock in frame

Thanks for offering to work on these features. They have been discussed and designed previously, please do some research into previous discussions. Search sugar-devel@ archives carefully, and summarise what you find. There are two features in the ticket; 1. adjust clock, 2. display clock. -

Re: [Sugar-devel] [UKids] Re: The future of Sugar on XO-1s

On 10 April 2016 at 20:35, Adam Holt wrote: > Just imagine if OLPC had not chosen to run off with $40 Millon in > community-driven revenue I don't understand this. What are you referring to? :) ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [UKids] Re: The future of Sugar on XO-1s

On 10 April 2016 at 20:35, Adam Holt wrote: > Back in that pre-Twitter era when it was somehow considered Perfectly Ok > and Normal to step on one's one community, as nothing more than pretty > Give1Get1 fundraising whores. CoC language fail :) ___ Su

Re: [Sugar-devel] The future of Sugar on XO-1s

James Cameron's engaging OLPC's emergent last-mile communities forthrightly (below) is *precisely* the ingredient that was missing in 2008 (evolution of http :// wiki.laptop.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] The future of Sugar on XO-1s

On 8 April 2016 at 16:23, Walter Bender wrote: > Just need a mechanism for accessing a supply of XO-4s... > >> Who has bought XO-4s, and in what quantities? ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo

Re: [Sugar-devel] The future of Sugar on XO-1s

On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 08:47:35AM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote: > > On 9 April 2016 at 06:31, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > The XO-4 is in production. > > What's the minimum order from OLPC? :)  You are asking for the minimum order quantity (MOQ) of the XO-4. I don't know,

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Display clock in frame

Hi, I would like to work on this feature-enhancement -> https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/3829. Could anyone here please share the expected behaviors and design ? Thanks, Utkarsh Tiwari ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org htt

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python is good - don't waste time (was Re:The future of Sugar on XO-1s)

> > > > I'm specifically interested by Android version of GCompris and Scratch > JR. > You should add TuxPaint to your list. There are others with learning > potential depending on age and focus: MineTest, Game of Life, Hydra > Slayer, Constellations. Piano, Accordion. Pixelesque... > > Yes sure !

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python is good - don't waste time (was Re:The future of Sugar on XO-1s)

Yes, it's because of the size of the tablet. The toolbar size (and visibility of icons) change depending of the screen size. Open Sugarizer on the PC of your browser and resize the window size you'll see how it works. We probably need something like an expandable/scrollable toolbar to fit all scree