Re: [Sugar-devel] Are you using Sugar daily for your own education?

2016-05-29 Thread Dave Crossland
On 29 May 2016 at 19:10, Laura Vargas wrote: > I believe Sugar is a powerful tool for other homeschoolers as well. I agree, I think the unschooling home/parent market has high product/market-fit potential :) ___ Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] The future of Sugar on XO-1s

2016-05-29 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi I want to return to this older thread because of James Cameron's comment in https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/688#issuecomment-222393275 : On the assumption that Sugar Labs is dropping support for XO-1, I'll close this pull request. Thanks for your time! But I understood from Tony and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Are you using Sugar daily for your own education?

2016-05-29 Thread Laura Vargas
Us (we and our children) used to use Sugar, not daily but weekly. I believe Sugar is a powerful tool for other homeschoolers as well. I hope we get the XO's back into shape soon, they do miss them. Regards 2016-05-28 22:19 GMT+08:00 Dave Crossland : > > Hi > > Is anyone on this

Re: [Sugar-devel] Release Sugar 0.109.0.0

2016-05-29 Thread Dave Crossland
On 29 May 2016 at 17:27, Jerry Vonau wrote: > I already know how copr works ;) I was asking for the benefit of others who > are not familiar with the process, Thank you for the prompt reply. > I think this should be on the website :)

Re: [Sugar-devel] Release Sugar 0.109.0.0

2016-05-29 Thread Jerry Vonau
> On May 29, 2016 at 5:01 PM Sam Parkinson > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > > > > >> On May 29, 2016 at 5:27 AM Sam Parkinson > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hello All, > >> >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Release Sugar 0.109.0.0

2016-05-29 Thread Sam Parkinson
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote: On May 29, 2016 at 5:27 AM Sam Parkinson wrote: Hello All, This is an unstable release, the 1st of the 0.110 development series. Tarballs are avaliable for sugar [1] and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Release Sugar 0.109.0.0

2016-05-29 Thread Dave Crossland
On 29 May 2016 at 06:02, Walter Bender wrote: > > Here is the old thread about activity unit testing [6]. Shall we make a > plan to get this (or some better approach) integrated into the next release? > > [6] >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Release Sugar 0.109.0.0

2016-05-29 Thread Dave Crossland
On 29 May 2016 at 09:55, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > > Please report bugs on bugs.sugarlabs.org. > > > > Sorry I have not being paying close attention, isn't that moving? I am still moving all the activities themselves to Github; then I'll work to freeze gitorious; then I'll move

Re: [Sugar-devel] Release Sugar 0.109.0.0

2016-05-29 Thread Jerry Vonau
> On May 29, 2016 at 5:27 AM Sam Parkinson > wrote: > > > Hello All, > > This is an unstable release, the 1st of the 0.110 development series. > Tarballs are avaliable for sugar [1] and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [2]. > > I'd like to thank all the contributors towards

Re: [Sugar-devel] Release Sugar 0.109.0.0

2016-05-29 Thread Walter Bender
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Sam Parkinson wrote: > Hello All, > > This is an unstable release, the 1st of the 0.110 development series. > Tarballs are avaliable for sugar [1] and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [2]. > Nice. > > I'd like to thank all the contributors towards

[Sugar-devel] Release Sugar 0.109.0.0

2016-05-29 Thread Sam Parkinson
Hello All, This is an unstable release, the 1st of the 0.110 development series. Tarballs are avaliable for sugar [1] and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [2]. I'd like to thank all the contributors towards this release. There have been many new features [1] including Proxy Settings [2] (thanks to