Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.112 roadmap dates?

2017-04-26 Thread James Cameron
Thanks, I've updated the roadmap. On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 02:33:13PM +, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote: > Hi James, not really. > I haven't been active with Sugar development lately (school, freelancer, and > other stuff); so I may not be the indicated to suggest dates. > > But I think we can

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] motion for a new mission statement

2017-04-26 Thread James Cameron
I'm fine with that mission too. -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Turtle Blocks-215

2017-04-26 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4027 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.110 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/29266/turtleblocks-215.xo Release notes: 215 * fix error on fb_plugin menu creation (AlanJAS) * fix get_endswith_files function (AlanJAS) *

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] motion for a new mission statement

2017-04-26 Thread Laura Vargas
Hi all, Hola a todos, In my opinion, the proposed mission is an improvement from the text approved on January by former SLOBs, Still I believe we can do better. It is a challenge to make it work in only one sentence without neglecting any "sugar labs key concept", such as: - community -

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.112 roadmap dates?

2017-04-26 Thread Ignacio Rodríguez
Hi James, not really. I haven't been active with Sugar development lately (school, freelancer, and other stuff); so I may not be the indicated to suggest dates. But I think we can "freeze" it once we land all patches pending in github, where some of them were supposed to land for 0.110 or so

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugarlabs/sugar] Revert "Fixed Issue: #4940 Journal entries name can be renamed to blank" (#752)

2017-04-26 Thread Tony Anderson
What 'finer points' do you feel are outstanding? Here is the checklist - * Flake8 in alerts.py fixed Please note - There are already existing flake8 errors before this PR. I would suggest fixing them in a separate PR rather than including in this one. * Branch rebased to the latest

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3] Save As Popup (#327)

2017-04-26 Thread Tony Anderson
As you may know, I submitted this feature for GSOC17. Along with Sebastian Silva, I worked as a mentor on this project. The feature was modeled on the way most document processors work. They offer the ability to save or save as the document. Save is used when the document has already been

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugarlabs/sugar] Failure to merge PR #327

2017-04-26 Thread Tony Anderson
The purpose of the feature has been described over and over again. It is not about files with blank titles. Utkarsh chose to alert the user who clicked on ok with a blank title. Perfectly reasonable programming decision. The technical issues you raised were fixed by Utkarsh quickly and

[Sugar-devel] 0.112 roadmap dates?

2017-04-26 Thread James Cameron
G'day, Are there dates yet for the 0.112 roadmap? http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.112/Roadmap I'm particularly interested in strings, UI, and API freeze. -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugarlabs/sugar] Revert "Fixed Issue: #4940 Journal entries name can be renamed to blank" (#752)

2017-04-26 Thread Tony Anderson
That is apparently exactly what you are doing, forcing the learner to think like you do. What about the learner who would like an alert when entering a blank title? Does that thinking count for anything? My mode of thinking is that #327 is what it is and should be merged without any more

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugarlabs/sugar] Revert "Fixed Issue: #4940 Journal entries name can be renamed to blank" (#752)

2017-04-26 Thread Tony Anderson
The issue #4940 was well taken. The fix should have been applied. Back in the day, a customer wanted to show off his hospital database. His query was for patients older that 100. He was amazed to see huge list. Turned out that date of birth had been left blank and so the epoch date zero was