Hello all,
It is more than 24hrs since walter requested this motion should be
seconded, so that voting can begin.
Sorry for thinking this way, but is it that the community don't want to
support the Bordeaux trip at all?
This is the second time i am making a proposal. First, was for me and Ibiam
Dear Friends,
Many of you know of the Sugarizer project from OLPC France:
http://sugarizer.org/
If you've never run a Sugar environment on your own computer, the Web
app is an awesome way to "get a taste of Sugar" in your web-broswer.
http://try.sugarizer.org/
The Sugarizer project is
Okay, i heard you.
I think me replying to some statements will create more discussion, so i
wouldn't.
Could it be seconded, as walter suggested so that it could be voted upon?
SG
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> If board members cannot feed themselves in
If board members cannot feed themselves in their own country, and
additionally Sugar Labs is being asked to create my-favorite-hotel in
my-favorite-neighborhood welfare handouts for its own board members in
their own countries, we have a far deeper long-term problem on our hands
here, that will
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Jun 3, 2017 8:37 AM, "Walter Bender" wrote:
>
> Please excuse the top post.
>
> I'd like to bring some clarity to the discussion of this motion. As most
> of you know, Sugar Labs is a member project
On Jun 3, 2017 8:37 AM, "Walter Bender" wrote:
Please excuse the top post.
I'd like to bring some clarity to the discussion of this motion. As most of
you know, Sugar Labs is a member project of the Software Freedom
Conservancy. The Conservancy has well-established
Please excuse the top post.
I'd like to bring some clarity to the discussion of this motion. As most of
you know, Sugar Labs is a member project of the Software Freedom
Conservancy. The Conservancy has well-established guidelines for travel,
and the travel plans in the proposal accompanying the
7 matches
Mail list logo