Re: [Sugar-devel] Port to TelepathyGLib

Hi, On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 3:11 AM, James Cameron wrote: > As you may have seen in my post in the last hour, forks of software > dilute maintainership, and everyone is worse off. > As part of porting to Python 3, we need to port to TelepathyGLib as > well. This is because

Re: [Sugar-devel] FAQ on Sugarizer

At the cited meeting, I was prepared to update the status of activities on ASLO and github. However, there was no interest. A quick summary: There are 514 activities divided into three groups:     83  which have the current version from github installed on aslo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Port to TelepathyGLib

Thanks for working on this. As you may have seen in my post in the last hour, forks of software dilute maintainership, and everyone is worse off. As part of porting to Python 3, we need to port to TelepathyGLib as well. This is because there is no maintained static binding of Telepathy for

Re: [Sugar-devel] FAQ on Sugarizer

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:09 PM James Cameron wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:27:59PM +0200, Lionel Laské wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've read on a recent sugar-meeting questions regarding Sugarizer > > packaging. > > Because I've just released version 1.0, > > Thanks for

Re: [Sugar-devel] FAQ on Sugarizer

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:27:59PM +0200, Lionel Laské wrote: > Hi all, > > I've read on a recent sugar-meeting questions regarding Sugarizer > packaging. > Because I've just released version 1.0, Thanks for the reminder; I've rebased the Sugar Labs clone of your Sugarizer repository. > I think

[Sugar-devel] FAQ on Sugarizer

Hi all, I've read on a recent sugar-meeting [1] questions regarding Sugarizer packaging. Because I've just released version 1.0, I think it's the right time to build a Sugarizer FAQ. I'm answering below on questions asked during this meeting but I will be please to add to this future FAQ all

Re: [Sugar-devel] Port to TelepathyGLib

Hi, I started understanding how Telepathy and DBus work, and porting our code to use their PyGI bindings instead of static bindings, and it looks like a big task. Also, GitHub search gives 72 results https://github.com/search?p=5=org%3Asugarlabs+%22from+telepathy%22=Code=%E2%9C%93 for instances