Re: [Sugar-devel] Enquiry Regarding Contribution To Write Activity Project

My guess is what we call "Tables" in English. I'm not the right person to answer. "git blame" shows the wording came from Lionel. https://github.com/sugarlabs/GSoC/blame/master/Ideas-2019.md#L474 Lionel speaks French. These two Google Translations suggest that "Array" is a valid translation;

Re: [Sugar-devel] Enquiry Regarding Contribution To Write Activity Project

Hello James , I have a query . The idea page refers to having arrays in the text editor . Is the arrays here stand for arrays in programming language or something else ? I have attached screenshot with this

Re: [Sugar-devel] Math_Hurdle activity keeps getting stuck

You mean the Math Hurdler activity. https://github.com/sugarlabs/math-hurdler No, you're not alone. I saw this too. I'm not surprised, as the activity was unfinished and had latent problems that were preventing testing with Sugar. Other activities from the same team had similar problems.

Re: [Sugar-devel] To Cameron: ML idea discussion

Godo discussion, thanks. In addition to hardware limits, also try to avoid requiring internet access. -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] Math_Hurdle activity keeps getting stuck

Hi, In math-hurdle activity , the activity freezes on startup, one of the reasons behind which could have been starting pygame loop before activity constructor returns. I have checked that the activity constructor is returned before the main pygame loop is run but i am still not able to figure

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: To Cameron: ML idea discussion

> > on my machine. >>> > > > > I am facing this problem from last 2 days if >>> anyone can >>> > solve this >>> > > the >>> > > > help >>> >

Re: [Sugar-devel] To Cameron: ML idea discussion

from last 2 days if >>> anyone can >>> > solve this >>> > > the >>> > > > help >>> > > > > will be appreciated. >>> > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] To Cameron: ML idea discussion

mailto:[17]qu...@laptop.org >> > > [5] [18]https://rit.edu/ >> > > [6] [19]https://github.com/sugarlabs/math-hurdler >> > > [7] mailto:[20]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> > > [8] [21]http://lists.su

[Sugar-devel] Review of the GSoC proposal

Hello mentors! I am Prabhu Pant, a final year undergraduate student from College of Technology, Pantnagar. I have been contributing to open source from a year now and I would like to work on the project "Create a new set of activities for Sugarizer". I have attached the link to my proposal.

[Sugar-devel] To Cameron: ML idea discussion

ptop.org > > [4] https://help.sugarlabs.org/en/sugar_ui.html > > [5] https://help.sugarlabs.org/en/home_view.html > > [6] mailto:qu...@laptop.org > > [7] http://activity.info/ > > [8] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities > > [9] mailto:qu...@laptop.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSOC19 proposal

It's not critical to me, since I'm not one of the coding mentors for that idea. However, the document would not flow well if the implementation was added at that point in the document. It may be appropriate to place it at the end as an appendix, and give a summary and link inside document. On

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity

Yes, I have, thanks. On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:22:24AM +0530, kushagra nigam wrote: > This is with reference to that GNOME cursor thing. I have created a pull > request [1]https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/828. Kindly review it and > let me know if it needs any changes. > > Sincerely >

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSOC19 proposal

Thank you all for your reviews and suggestions. I will make the required changes. Regards Sparsh Agarwal On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 12:05, Jaskirat Singh wrote: > Hi Sparsh, > > I just went through your proposal, I see you added the link to another doc > where you wrote about implementation. > I

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSOC19 proposal

Hi Sparsh, I just went through your proposal, I see you added the link to another doc where you wrote about implementation. I think if you could merge that other doc in the same proposal only, that would be much better I guess. But overall it looks good. Thanks On Wed, 27 Mar 2019, 11:19 am