Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2019; Selection of Mentors and Projects

2019-04-06 Thread Walter Bender
On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 5:34 PM Rahul Bothra wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 2:21 AM Lionel Laské > wrote: > > As I already said my preference is to have one mentor only by project. > > Thanks. I agree with the responsibilities you listed. > I'd prefer 2 mentors per project, and the duo can

[Sugar-devel] _GSoC_Proposal for "New_Sugar_Activity"

2019-04-06 Thread jooyoung kim
Hello Sugars, This is my proposal link for a new SugarLabs activity, please have a look, and feed backs are always wellcomed. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w4atjeBqeCIMSCFmdNCV2SbZUugl0bPC/view?usp=sharing Have a nice day, Jooyoung Kim ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gsoc Proposal for "performance in musicblocks"

2019-04-06 Thread Samson Goddy
Great proposal. Glad to see you are still contributing to MB. On Sat, Apr 6, 2019, 2:23 PM Sumit Srivastava wrote: > The proposal is great. > Also, thank you for all the help with bug discovery. > ᐧ > > On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 6:43 PM Walter Bender > wrote: > >> It looks very comprehensive to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gsoc Proposal for "performance in musicblocks"

2019-04-06 Thread Sumit Srivastava
The proposal is great. Also, thank you for all the help with bug discovery. ᐧ On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 6:43 PM Walter Bender wrote: > It looks very comprehensive to me. (Thanks for adding the section on > Promises.) > > -walter > > On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 6:01 AM Favour Kelvin > wrote: > >> I

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gsoc Proposal for "performance in musicblocks"

2019-04-06 Thread Walter Bender
It looks very comprehensive to me. (Thanks for adding the section on Promises.) -walter On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 6:01 AM Favour Kelvin wrote: > I have not gotten any reviews yet on my proposal > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, 1:55 AM James Cameron wrote: > >> Thanks! >> >> -- >> James Cameron >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gsoc Proposal for "performance in musicblocks"

2019-04-06 Thread Jaskirat Singh
Hey, It looks good to me. On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, 3:31 pm Favour Kelvin I have not gotten any reviews yet on my proposal > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, 1:55 AM James Cameron wrote: > >> Thanks! >> >> -- >> James Cameron >> http://quozl.netrek.org/ >> ___ >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] Gsoc Proposal for "performance in musicblocks"

2019-04-06 Thread Favour Kelvin
I have not gotten any reviews yet on my proposal On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, 1:55 AM James Cameron wrote: > Thanks! > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.netrek.org/ > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Proposals for Create new set of activities

2019-04-06 Thread Chihurumnaya Ibiam
Hi Tony, No doubt that v1.4 isn't a limitation but v3.0 has more features and it would be great if that is provided for them too. On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 9:52 PM Tony Anderson wrote: > Scratch is heavily used in Rwanda. The users do not find the 1.4 version > as a limitation. > > As far as I can

Re: [Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project

2019-04-06 Thread Jake Scarlet
I tested the API from Speak activity. It's fine but I personally found https://github.com/Hagsten/Talkify to be a better option. I could also tweak the voice a bit to make it sound like Alice from the Python version of write, I've looked into the licencing and all. So should I use this or the one