Re: [Sugar-devel] New logo for Sugar Labs

2020-02-09 Thread Miracle Oti
Option 3 > On Feb 10, 2020, at 12:36 AM, Miracle Oti wrote: > > I so much love the first concept. > > >> On Feb 8, 2020, at 3:31 PM, Peace Ojemeh wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I mentioned this earlier a few weeks ago. >> >> In the last couple weeks, I’ve been working with a small

Re: [Sugar-devel] New logo for Sugar Labs

2020-02-09 Thread Miracle Oti
I so much love the first concept. > On Feb 8, 2020, at 3:31 PM, Peace Ojemeh wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I mentioned this earlier a few weeks ago. > > In the last couple weeks, I’ve been working with a small group of design > volunteers(all cc'ed) to come up with a couple of new logo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Port to Gtk3: Gdk.Image error

2020-02-09 Thread James Cameron
Thanks for working on this. I'm looking forward especially to your porting of the C++ code in this activity, as that will be critical to success of the porting. For reference, the issue you are working is https://github.com/sugarlabs/Bounce/issues/7 My further reply in context below. On Sun,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Introduction box code

2020-02-09 Thread James Cameron
Which application? On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 08:15:03PM +0530, Rahul kohli wrote: > In which file the code is available for introduction box which > introduce us to the application? -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar AI

2020-02-09 Thread Srevin Saju
Thanks for the feedback Walter Bender. The python library I am using is called, SpaCy has support for all popular languages https://spacy.io/usage/models#languages I had kept that language diversity in consideration when I started building on it. thanks for your interest. The current name for the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar AI

2020-02-09 Thread Walter Bender
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 12:02 PM Srevin Saju wrote: > I am currently working on an Artificial Intelligence for Sugar (20% > complete), and I looking forward for suggestions of how good the idea might > be, or if its not necessary. > > The aim of the bot is to: > * An entirely new user to sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 136, Issue 18

2020-02-09 Thread Srevin Saju
Out of the given options, Option 2 looks professional :) On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 8:02 PM wrote: > Send Sugar-devel mailing list submissions to > sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

[Sugar-devel] Sugar AI

2020-02-09 Thread Srevin Saju
I am currently working on an Artificial Intelligence for Sugar (20% complete), and I looking forward for suggestions of how good the idea might be, or if its not necessary. The aim of the bot is to: * An entirely new user to sugar might have to read the documentation to understand how to use a