[Sugar-devel] Write failure to save (Re: SoaS v10 Test Compose 3)

2013-12-17 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 27 November 2013 11:48, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Fedora is now in Freeze locking down for release so we're into bugfix only mode but if we could get a fix soon for things like the Write save to journal bug we should be able to land it in time. This is at least part of

Re: [Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

2013-12-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
. On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: As an update, we are now back to the intermittent datastore tests failure which we have been getting for a while. http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/full-master/builds/17/steps/shell_3/logs/modules [1A

Re: [Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

2013-12-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 12 December 2013 16:28, Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comwrote: good point Gonzalo, finishing with env.js we will move to review datastore at any time. Daniel, I think we can increase the timeout until we can find a solution? while we work on a solution we can go see if

Re: [Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

2013-12-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 12 December 2013 20:11, Code Raguet irag...@activitycentral.com wrote: what about this? Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/broot/sugar-build/build/out/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/jarabe/frame/devicestray.py, line 35, in __init__ mod.setup(self) File

Re: [Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

2013-12-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
When failing 1386868991.611618 DEBUG gwebsockets: Received text message {method:datastore.set_metadata,id:3,params:[d02d98ab-7bab-4cf5-92c8-24409a6c35d7,{title:hello}],jsonrpc:2.0} 1386868994.676076 DEBUG gwebsockets: Got data, length 278 1386868995.920466 DEBUG gwebsockets: Got data, length 214

Re: [Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

2013-12-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Very similar delay in your logs 1386875635.966910 DEBUG root: IndexStore.flush: force=True _pending_writes=0 1386875641.161983 DEBUG root: FileStore: Nothing to do There is a 5 seconds timeout in datastore too # Force a flush after _n_ seconds since the last change to the db _FLUSH_TIMEOUT = 5

Re: [Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

2013-12-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
So I added a couple of logs around database.update(), which is the only place it seems it could block for a while. A good log looks like 1386896014.997774 DEBUG root: IndexStore.flush: force=True _pending_writes=0 1386896014.997934 DEBUG root: Start database flush 1386896015.016607 DEBUG root:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hoodie, a good reference for Sugar Web

2013-12-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
sorry I don't find time for Sugar lately, I will be back into hacking, reviewing and discussions soon! -- .. manuq .. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez

Re: [Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

2013-12-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Right, as expected 1386897905.351919 DEBUG root: IndexStore.flush: force=True _pending_writes=0 1386897905.352442 DEBUG root: Start database flush 1386897909.310487 DEBUG root: Completed database flush 1386897909.334923 DEBUG root: FileStore: Nothing to do Only on the first save(). Using

Re: [Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

2013-12-11 Thread Daniel Narvaez
As an update, we are now back to the intermittent datastore tests failure which we have been getting for a while. http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/full-master/builds/17/steps/shell_3/logs/modules [1AChrome 25.0 (Linux): Executed 16 of 34 Chrome 25.0 (Linux) datastore should be

Re: [Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

2013-12-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 10 December 2013 20:47, Code Raguet irag...@activitycentral.com wrote: Hello, list! quick-master is failing in almost every build since last Sunday (Dec 8). I'd like to fix this and get back to green. I'm not able to replay this failure locally, has anyone a failing local env? Not me

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Network view refresh button

2013-12-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
, Emil Dudev ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

2013-12-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
it fails again, I guess. But let me know if you want access to the slaves. On 10 December 2013 21:54, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 December 2013 20:47, Code Raguet irag...@activitycentral.comwrote: Hello, list! quick-master is failing in almost every build since last Sunday

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.101.0 (unstable)

2013-12-08 Thread Daniel Narvaez
.tar.xz http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-artwork/sugar-artwork-0.101.0.tar.xz http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-runner/sugar-runner-0.101.1.tar.xz These are now built for Fedora 21/rawhide. Peter -- Daniel Narvaez

[Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.101.0 (unstable)

2013-12-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
-0.101.0.tar.xz http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-runner/sugar-runner-0.101.1.tar.xz A lot of people contributed to this release. Thanks to everyone! -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] External devices @ development environment

2013-12-05 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Gio.VolumeMonitor.get(). This is where I'm stuck. Does anyone have a similar problem? Emil Dudev ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez

Re: [Sugar-devel] Flake8 error

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
.git INFO:root:Running command git fetch INFO:root:Running: git fetch INFO:root:fatal: remote error: INFO:root: Repository not found. https://github.com/bmcustodio/flake8 ¡Not found! I attach the log -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing

Re: [Sugar-devel] Flake8 error

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
As a workaround you can hack modules.js and remove the flake8 entry. On Wednesday, 4 December 2013, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote: Oh ok, I need it :S Saludos. Ignacio Rodríguez 2013/12/4 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com'); Looks like

Re: [Sugar-devel] Flake8 error

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
to teach osbuild about mercurial... On Wednesday, 4 December 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: As a workaround you can hack modules.js and remove the flake8 entry. On Wednesday, 4 December 2013, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote: Oh ok, I need it :S Saludos. Ignacio Rodríguez 2013/12/4 Daniel Narvaez

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Journal time filter (was Re: Fwd: GCI task, Ticket #3026)

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org javascript:; http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Another sugar tests failure

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
by the delay, I was without electricity. Gonzalo On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com'); wrote: Gonzalo, maybe your resume palette patch? See the journaltoolbox.py traceback in the log. On Monday, 2 December

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Absolute time in the journal

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
with a time delta to be added to the real time of the system? The delta could be set in the control panel, to solve #3829 . Anyway, sounds tricky. -- .. manuq .. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web-activity: Store API documentation

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
://developer.sugarlabs.org/sugar-web/graphics/radiobuttonsgroup.js.html 2013/11/27 Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'rogeliom...@activitycentral.com'); : I will take note of this 2013/11/26 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web-activity: Store API documentation

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.com: I will take note of this 2013/11/26 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com We didn't really write much API docs yet (bad us) but the idea is to use docker js. http://jbt.github.io/docker/src/docker.js.html In theory this should

Re: [Sugar-devel] Flake8 error

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com'); It seems intentional because it was removed from their homepage too. Not sure what's the best fix. Maybe we should just pull these tools from pypi into the sugar-build virtualenv. It's unlikely anyone will want

[Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
have been used in a specific build? If there was a change, buildbot says the revision but not for those modules that didn't change. On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: Did you see the without-configuration issue in buildbot or locally? If locally could

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 3 December 2013 13:51, Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comwrote: 2013/12/3 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com What do you mean with emergence of sugar-toolkit-gtk3? I do not know the story of how this package came, when.., the main purpose.., not that long ago I'm

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 3 December 2013 15:54, Lionel Laské lio...@olpc-france.org wrote: Hi Daniel, May be I miss something but I don't see any compatibility risk on existing Web Activity neither need to upgrade the Sugar Web Framework. Right ? No issue with the current Web activity. Currently sugar-web

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 3 December 2013 20:08, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: I think we should develop sugar-web looking at the future, which in the case of GTK is WebKitGTK2. That being said, I don't mind a fallback to WebKitGTK1 if WebKitGTK2 is not available in the toolkit. But I think that we

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 4 December 2013 19:40, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: Just to clarify, the spirit of this last line is: * Do not allow special casing of sugar-web to support _only_ webkit1. ? Do not add code which is necessary for webkit1 support only. For example, do not have two

[Sugar-devel] Web server vs activities protocol (Re: Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1)

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 4 December 2013 19:50, Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comwrote over the course of thread I read that was a decision to avoid using web server, please, can you guys deepen this decision more in detail? I don't think it was ever properly evaluated. We had a very early discussion

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 4 December 2013 20:06, Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comwrote: 2013/12/4 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com This is a good concrete example of what worries me. Assuming the custom protocol is a slightly better solution (it might not be, it's a bit hard to evaluate

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar] Fix control panel search focus issue - SL #3188 (#168)

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Yes I meant something like that. I can't look deeper into it right now, but give me couple of days and I'll get back to you. On 4 December 2013 20:18, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@gmail.com wrote: Sending by traditional email :) On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Daniel Narvaez notificati

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Election Details for 2013-2014

2013-12-03 Thread Daniel Narvaez
, Luke -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

2013-12-03 Thread Daniel Narvaez
be more clear, I mean, android, simple browser and XO is an wide spectrum to cover, if we not have clarity that this serves for its purpose, add backward support right now, is overhead in my oppinion. 2013/12/2 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Frame icon to take a screenshot

2013-12-03 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Abente wrote: I like it! Maybe we can more information about how it works, IE: is it adding some delay before actually taking the screenshot? is it using any kind of cues to know when the screenshot was taken? On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Frame icon to take a screenshot

2013-12-03 Thread Daniel Narvaez
to know when the screenshot was taken? Probably not, Ignacio? Sounds like a good idea to me, also when taken with keyboard. (Perhaps we should add that in another step though, to avoid doing too much in this pull request). -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar

[Sugar-devel] GCI pull requests

2013-12-02 Thread Daniel Narvaez
, not bug fixes) -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

2013-12-02 Thread Daniel Narvaez
:_e({}, 'cvml', 'rogeliom...@activitycentral.com'); I will take note of this 2013/11/28 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com'); http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/quick-sucrose-0.100/builds/6/steps/shell_2/logs/modules We are getting

[Sugar-devel] Bundle builder tests failure

2013-12-02 Thread Daniel Narvaez
http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/full-master/builds/6/steps/shell_3/logs/stdio I suppose it was caused by the bundle builder patch. It would be good to fix this asap. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] web-activity: env.getEnvironment dependency with Python code

2013-12-02 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Github is a bit broken at the moment, but I'll try to finish up reviewing later tonight. Thanks. On Monday, 2 December 2013, Code Raguet wrote: On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com'); wrote: Those are hard

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bundle builder tests failure

2013-12-02 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Thanks! On Monday, 2 December 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Fixed and pushed. Gonzalo On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.orgjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'gonz...@laptop.org'); wrote: Working on that. On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bundle builder tests failure

2013-12-02 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Well you could also blame the reviewer :) Anyway, nice that the tests caught this... On Monday, 2 December 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: My mistake, my fix :) I learned something more today, always is good. Gonzalo On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Absolute time in the journal

2013-12-02 Thread Daniel Narvaez
? Which form should it take exactly? -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Frame icon to take a screenshot

2013-12-02 Thread Daniel Narvaez
). -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Another sugar tests failure

2013-12-02 Thread Daniel Narvaez
http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/quick-master/builds/29/steps/shell_2/logs/log Not sure what caused this. It would be good to fix it asap. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Another sugar tests failure

2013-12-02 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Gonzalo, maybe your resume palette patch? See the journaltoolbox.py traceback in the log. On Monday, 2 December 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/quick-master/builds/29/steps/shell_2/logs/log Not sure what caused this. It would be good to fix it asap

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

2013-12-02 Thread Daniel Narvaez
, used only when a environment variable is set, to make easier the testing, and be sure the changes we do works in both webkit1 and webkit2. A first proposal is available here https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/pull/54 Thoughts? Gonzalo -- Daniel Narvaez

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Triage meeting to review untriaged bugs

2013-11-29 Thread Daniel Narvaez
-- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Possible incompatibility between gtk2 activities and sugar-build

2013-11-28 Thread Daniel Narvaez
the file to .sugar/default, but is a workaround, and probably we will find other similar issues. Regards Gonzalo -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

2013-11-28 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On Wednesday, 27 November 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com'); wrote: I think it's good to have this upstream because otherwise changes to sugar-web will easily break webkit1

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

2013-11-28 Thread Daniel Narvaez
! 2013/11/27 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'gonz...@laptop.org'); On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com'); wrote: I think it's good to have this upstream because otherwise changes

Re: [Sugar-devel] web-activity: env.getEnvironment dependency with Python code

2013-11-27 Thread Daniel Narvaez
({}, 'cvml', 'rogeliom...@activitycentral.com'); wrote: 2013/11/27 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com'); My summary email is still valid but for completeness... I'm not sure it's possible even from inside webkit to implement a non-racy window-object

Re: [Sugar-devel] web-activity: env.getEnvironment dependency with Python code

2013-11-27 Thread Daniel Narvaez
: On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com'); wrote: It *might* not be possible to use the same approach on both. Though, interestingly, this is much easier on webkit1 so one way or another it should be possible

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

2013-11-27 Thread Daniel Narvaez
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/pull/54 Thoughts? Gonzalo -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Changing mime type in journal details view.

2013-11-26 Thread Daniel Narvaez
/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web-activity: Store API documentation

2013-11-26 Thread Daniel Narvaez
or example that describe this situation: Save when closing we activity - Fetch comments similar to that on source code and do same flow - Make a introduction of dictstore API and document it Regards! -- Roger Activity Central http://activitycentral.com/ -- Daniel Narvaez

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Changing mime type in journal details view.

2013-11-25 Thread Daniel Narvaez
___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Trouble saving Write 94 in Fedora 20

2013-11-25 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 25 November 2013 20:11, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.comwrote: On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 16:35 -0200, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Looks like a crash in abiword when try to open the saved file. Could you attach the document saved in the Journal, I guess my OP did not make it clear

[Sugar-devel] Helping with 0.102

2013-11-23 Thread Daniel Narvaez
progress and it's being a lot of fun. I'm mostly giving you chance to tackle some of the issues before the students fix them all :) -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] setup.py install and git submodules

2013-11-23 Thread Daniel Narvaez
.. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org javascript:; http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] setup.py install and git submodules

2013-11-23 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Another advantage of pypi is that distros knows how to deal with it already. To be honest I don't think activities should be packaged like distro packages though in practice people are doing that. On Saturday, 23 November 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: I'm not sure. I think we shouldn't refuse

[Sugar-devel] Stable branch in sugar-build

2013-11-23 Thread Daniel Narvaez
would be complicated to support. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Layout with gtk3

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 22 November 2013 12:49, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: Hi, sorry for not joining the discussion yet. I'm a bit overloaded with non-Sugar stuff. Ufff, we need you full time! :P I remember Agustín Zubiaga also mentioned Box(orientation) instead of HBox, VBox at the time of

[Sugar-devel] Python modules (Re: Introducing SimpleActivity / Introduciendo SimpleActivity

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python modules (Re: Introducing SimpleActivity / Introduciendo SimpleActivity

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
use, or the speak engine that Memorize for example uses. [1] http://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-pycha Regards, aguz 2013/11/22 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com Nice work, Augustin. I'm going a bit off topic here but in the future I think it would be nice if we had an easy way for activities

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python modules (Re: Introducing SimpleActivity / Introduciendo SimpleActivity

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
it for bigger libs as I do with sugar-pycha (lib) [1], that every activity can use, or the speak engine that Memorize for example uses. [1] http://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-pycha Regards, aguz 2013/11/22 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com Nice work, Augustin. I'm going a bit off topic here

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python modules (Re: Introducing SimpleActivity / Introduciendo SimpleActivity

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 22 November 2013 14:55, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: For users connectivity should not be a problem because the modules would be shipped with the bundle. Or you mean a user trying to write an activity

Re: [Sugar-devel] Python modules (Re: Introducing SimpleActivity / Introduciendo SimpleActivity

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 22 November 2013 15:09, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: We need think about the options. I feel something wrong when think about multiple copies of the same code/library/data, but is true in some spaces the world is going in that direction. Heh I feel something wrong too,

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-web: env.js questions

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 22 November 2013 19:31, Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comwrote: Hi, Can you help me to understand the getEnvironment function ( https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-web/blob/master/env.js)?. This is used to pass some initial environment variables from python. My understanding

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-web: env.js questions

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
to decide what we want to do with getEnvironment exactly... On 22 November 2013 19:56, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 November 2013 19:31, Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comwrote: Hi, Can you help me to understand the getEnvironment function ( https://github.com

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-web: env.js questions

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
are doing it a lot there). And handle the null case to avoid an error when running standalone. On 22 November 2013 19:59, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Oh actually I see why it succeeds... The test doesn't verify that it receives a response. It will only fail if it gets the wrong answer

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-web: env.js questions

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 22 November 2013 20:19, Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comwrote: 2013/11/22 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com Oh actually I see why it succeeds... The test doesn't verify that it receives a response. It will only fail if it gets the wrong answer (and it probably it's

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-web: env.js questions

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 22 November 2013 21:20, Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comwrote: 2013/11/22 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com Yes the callback is never executed because there is no python notification. And our test succeeds because it doesn't make sure that the callback is called. Ok, I

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-web: env.js questions

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 22 November 2013 22:59, Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comwrote: About the logic, unfortunately checking window.sugar won't work because we can't assume window.sugar has been already set when getEnvironment is called... the python code you linked might be called after

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-web: env.js questions

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 23 November 2013 00:59, Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comwrote: This sounds good, in summary, We should have the logic of window.location in env.isStandalone method and env.getEnvironment still like now but uses IsStandalone like you say above, Yes. this will allow

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-web: env.js questions

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 23 November 2013 01:34, Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comwrote: 2013/11/22 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com You mean it will fix the race condition that I discussed with Code on that pull request right? If so, yes. yeah, that Ok, I'll try to make the changes according

Re: [Sugar-devel] Layout with gtk3

2013-11-21 Thread Daniel Narvaez
20, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: I think, in general, we should start using Gtk.Grid for all our layout needs https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/gtk-migrating-GtkGrid.html -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Layout with gtk3

2013-11-21 Thread Daniel Narvaez
promote it as a change? :) Gonzalo On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: The idea is that Gtk.Grid should solve that kind of stuff, I think. If you run into cases you can't cover please post about them. Also if/when we really need to use boxes we should use

Re: [Sugar-devel] Layout with gtk3

2013-11-21 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: No need to apologize, take it like a code review suggestion :) On 21 November 2013 14:44, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: You are right. I understand your point now, and I apologize by that. I should try your

Re: [Sugar-devel] Layout with gtk3

2013-11-21 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 21 November 2013 13:03, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: Sigh. It's promoted by the gtk developers in their documentation, not by me. It's designed as a replacement for all the other layout containers. I'm

Re: [Sugar-devel] Layout with gtk3

2013-11-21 Thread Daniel Narvaez
excuse :( will try to do better Gonzalo On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: On 21 November 2013 13:03, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: Sigh. It's promoted

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] No keyboard choice - Re: SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-20 Thread Daniel Narvaez
://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/135 Can we get this in the 0.100.1 release for this week? The patch is on master only at the moment. Gonzalo can you confirm that you are going to take care of the picking/merging before releasing? -- Daniel Narvaez

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue running karma from osbuild shell

2013-11-20 Thread Daniel Narvaez
://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Web, use strict mode?

2013-11-19 Thread Daniel Narvaez
javascript:; http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Performance issues on XO 1 (Re: TamTamMini)

2013-11-19 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 19 November 2013 07:08, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.orgwrote: - What is slow exactly? Initial startup, switch between activities, activity startup. Also probably redraw after widget damage e.g. the Frame appears. Then again it's hard to pinpoint exactly, just out of memory now.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Performance issues on XO 1 (Re: TamTamMini)

2013-11-19 Thread Daniel Narvaez
to the previous point... why did we regress compared to pygtk2? Can we do anything about it? https://mail.gnome.org/archives/python-hackers-list/2013-August/msg2.html Has this landed? -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 17 November 2013 21:53, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 November 2013 21:52, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: I made a patches to hide those. I submitted the sugar part for review Argh, sent accidentally... I submitted the sugar part for review https

[Sugar-devel] Performance issues on XO 1 (Re: TamTamMini)

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
not targeting Gnome 3.* * [1] *http://blog.lxde.org/?p=990 -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
and is thinking about what GUI toolkit to use, personally I might recommend Qt if you’re not targeting Gnome 3.* * [1] *http://blog.lxde.org/?p=990 -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On Monday, 18 November 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: And we can tackle lower level stuff... It's free and open code too! :) On Monday, 18 November 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: There are some ow level stuff, but we can solve some problems in the activities too. You can see the other thread I

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar's future: soliciting feedback

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
handled? With pippy the maintainers quickly responded with Cool someone else wants to add value to the project. Here are my notes. Good luck. With TamTam the maintainer responded with My way or the highway. On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Also note

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hi Flavio, On 19 November 2013 00:02, Flavio Danesse fdane...@activitycentral.comwrote: Sorry to put me back, but to bring a little clarity on TamTam: Do not say that the patch is huge because I never send a patch for this just to avoid giving this discussion which does not yield as well.

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 19 November 2013 02:52, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.comwrote: Seriously, stop thinking you are being treaten unfairly. You are not. This is about open source best practices. The goal is to highlight the difference a maintainer's attitude has on the tone of a discussion. Try

Re: [Sugar-devel] Write fails to launch

2013-11-17 Thread Daniel Narvaez
-build modules? Gonzalo On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah that's a known issue, unfortunately Fedora 19 doesn't have abiword introspection support. It will be solved when we upgrade to Fedora 20. On Friday, 1 November 2013, Sai Vineet wrote

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 17 November 2013 18:38, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.orgwrote: In Flavio's defense, I'd like to restructure this conversation. Undoubtedly, he's put great effort in this work. I suspect it's a great contribution, which is exactly why I'm mad it's not going upstream... In my

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 17 November 2013 18:58, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: El 17/11/13 12:38, Sebastian Silva escribió: I spent the last month trying to get mantainers to respond to requests to update GTK2

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 17 November 2013 19:20, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: Like I see it, is not a fork. Sebastian said he don't want make changes in the activities, only want add translation files, and package them in a xo file. If someone needs to package gtk2 activities, how they will know they

Re: [Sugar-devel] Write fails to launch

2013-11-17 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 17 November 2013 19:21, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Peter, is it possible to get 3.0 in Fedora 19 now that the issue is solved? I've seen the change in git but I don't see an rpm, not even

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >