braries that could work offline.
> It's why Speak is better thought its quality is worse than Talkify.
>
> Regards.
>
>Lionel.
>
> Le sam. 6 avr. 2019 à 10:48, a
> écrit :
>
>>
>> Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 12:34:56 +0530
>&g
in Speak activity?
On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 04:33, James Cameron wrote:
> Look for any APIs used now in Sugarizer for text to speech, and use
> the same?
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 05:59:50AM +1400, Jake Scarlet wrote:
> > Ah yes James, that's exactly what I meant to ask. Than
Ah yes James, that's exactly what I meant to ask. Thank you all for your
feedback.
The project idea mentions that We can use an existing API based text editor
for the base. I've decided to go with QuillJS (one of the mentioned
options), mainly for the flexibility and the fact that It can be
Would it be preferable if I used an existing library for the spellcheck
feature or if I created one by myself
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
4 matches
Mail list logo
