pt the network config separate, under
/home/olpc/.sugar, i think. it took a while before gnome and
sugar wifi configs were synced.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://list
t; de...@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
itself.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
.
paul
Best regards and Have fun
Christian Stroetmann
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
by vivitar. (i
know that james knows this -- i'm just clarifying for others.)
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
if a previous connection attempt was unsuccessful. this means
that clicking on open networks that aren't really open will grow
the list, as will selecting a non-guest network by mistake.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
, but this might happen if your hardware can receive but
not transmit.
try the wlan diagnostic in OFW. boot to the 'ok' prompt, then
ok test /wlan
and see what you get.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
___
Devel mailing list
de...@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
and a XO-4 (as far
as that code is written to either run a command
attached to the event (currently /usr/bin/olpc-rotate), or pass the event
through, but not both is concerned)?
yes. and for XO-1 and XO-1.5 as well.
paul
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org
/clock.py#line109
note that that code also contains references to ohmd, which are no
longer necessary.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar
/technology/usb4butia_a_truly_free_as_in_freedom_input_output_board.html
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
:)
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
gonzalo wrote:
Write does not know what is the ebook switch state, that logic is in the
osk.
Looking in the wiki and sugar code, I could not find information about
how
read the switch,
but in ticket
ajay wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
ajay wrote:
Hi all.
A simple solution was found :)
I hacked the KP_Prior and KP_Next keys, and now they are used for
making-window-smaller and restoring-original-window-size
Jerry
part 2 text/plain 153
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
return 0;
}
paul
Gonzalo
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
i believe sugar already has code to detect the two modes, since
that's how it knows
match on the longer string of zeros:14B6 in /proc/net/tcp6
and not check both files for speed.
why would ipv4 backward compatibility not be a concern?
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
153
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing
/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar
for being unclear the last time around.
Thanks and Regards,
Ajay
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
ajay wrote:
Any ideas ?
Please, Please.
i'm confused. when i get that dialog, it's because that network
is secured, and requires
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
--
1.7.10.1
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing
gonzalo wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
i would much prefer that we could prevent suspend during any
audio playback, rather than have to have anyone that wants
to make noise do it individually.
But this should be done at a lower level
kevin wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
sascha wrote:
i've cherry-picked 65a5f2b3 onto olpc-2.6.35, and the autobuilder
did the rest. this implements a new libertas_disablemesh module
parameter which should keep mesh from being
on a patch by Paul Fox p...@laptop.org.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Silbe si...@activitycentral.com
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville linvi...@tuxdriver.com
-
The reason we've not gone the module parameter route so far (in
Dextrose 3) is that we didn't want to divert from upstream (OLPC
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
this, and get back to you once done.
Thanks a ton
Regards,
Ajay
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
martin wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Ajay Garg ajaygargn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I believe that the number of packets
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
of
view), then press the power button to wake the laptop, the dongle
is briefly turned off and the connection is lost, negating any
benefit from keeping it powered during sleep.
Tony
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
benefit from keeping it powered during sleep.
Tony
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
.)
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
jerry wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:54 -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
jerry wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 16:44 +1100, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
David
This message was sent with a gsm dongle on an xo-1
modem:Huawei E160E
carrier:Locked to Dodo
___
Devel mailing list
de...@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
the touchpad. Won't have to type a thing!
Before I go experimenting with this though, I was hoping someone could let
me know what commands should be run to re-enable the keyboard!
Danny Iland
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
walter wrote
Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
is
supported in 1.75 firmware. but that's the only incompatibility i
know of.
paul
Gonzalo
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
walter wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Agustin Zubiaga Sanchez
a...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Hello
,
but don't know, that this would not be hard to implement.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
129
___
Devel mailing list
de...@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
martin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
- hitting brightness down one more time when at level 0 will
switch to mono. users that use auto-repeat to get there probably
won't see a difference.
as discussed on this thread on friday (i think
://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
bert wrote:
On 24.11.2011, at 16:09, Paul Fox wrote:
bert wrote:
Today is a sunny day in cold Germany, unlike in the first half of the
week.
So
I took the 1.75 outside.
IMHO the auto-off is fine as implemented in os12. Not distracting at all.
Someone suggested
kevin wrote:
I too will test this weekend. Silly q: should I test both sugar and
gnome, or just sugar?
by all means, try both. it should work on VT console screens, too.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel
bert wrote:
On 24.11.2011, at 17:23, Paul Fox wrote:
bert wrote:
So I would rather not add that extra step below 0.
okay, i'm fine with that -- i was on the fence. but i think you and
gary are saying two slightly different things.
you're saying that the manual
at the end of set_brightness() and brightness_ramp().
paul
Tony
___
Devel mailing list
de...@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
in powerd? Line 1793 looked
like it was going to be the culprit.
no, i coded it in /usr/bin/olpc-brightness. the code in powerd is there
for suspend dimming, and now, auto-backlight turnoff.
thanks,
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
Regards,
Simon
[1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Display_Device
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
peter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de
wrote:
El 21/11/11 15:18, Paul Fox escribió:
simon wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose the following Feature to enhance the Sugar
learning environment:
Add a frame
)) /sys/devices/platform/dcon/monochrome
don
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[1] http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Display#The_theory
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
bert wrote:
On 21.11.2011, at 15:22, Paul Fox wrote:
it quickly became clear (to me, at least) that it would be confusing
if user-dimming behaved differently than auto-backlight-control, with
respect to monochrome mode. whether or not it's confusing to the
user, it's definitely
the sensor, the circuitry behind it, the concept of
hysteresis, energy conservation (tie in the battery power meter),
contrast, and industrial controls.
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
-settings-daemon/tree/plugins/power/gsd-backlig
ht-helper.c
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
i wrote:
please try os12, when available, and see how it feels.
i'm afraid the necessary firmware didn't make the deadline for os12,
so you'll need to either wait for os13, or q4c05 firmware, whichever
comes first.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
-tree/banner-name, right?
That was my understanding. Discussion I had was with Paul Fox on 16th
August, and had to do with keymap rules and the need to not parse the
text, but rather support equivalence checking. It was first available
in Q4B08.
olpc-utils [1] should be updated
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
them?
i can't remember if there's still an appropriate trac ticket open -- if
not, create a new one.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo
for moving sugar to
GPL3, but somehow i think there must be more to it. i.e., what
exactly are the arguments in favor of _sugar_ changing licenses?
i have no stake in this decision at all -- i'm just wondering about
the why.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo
:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4371
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
the older instance. i click on it, and annoyingly, i have to yet
again change my hold on the laptop.
perhaps this is smooth/seamless on an iphone or android, but i'm having
trouble picturing it on an XO.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
as a special key. we're talking
about the ebook switch, which is an open or closed magnetic sensor
that can tell you when the screen is fully folded into the ebook
position.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar
not the case -- if focus
isn't on the text area, then you're stuck, and have to open the
laptop to click.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar
normal mode).
the more i think about it, the more i think that's a good idea.
what do other people (who, hopefully have tried both modes)
think?
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/2006/0001-touchpad
. :-)
pre-linking has been in the builds for some time, i believe.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
+node_file_handle.write(value)
+node_file_handle.close()
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
walter wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
walter wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:27 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com
@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
walter wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
walter wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:27 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote
builds, not in Sugar mainline.
can you remind me of the specific issue(s) here?
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
in
order for all the characters to work correctly. i don't know if
there's a programming API lurking under the covers in
setxkbmap -print, or not.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
-07-2010 a las 23:08 -0400, Paul Fox escribió:
i think everyone (except
apple, i'm learning tonight) agrees this is the correct setup
when not in sugar.
Lenovo also seems to be switching to the Apple layout:
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01
bernie wrote:
El Fri, 16-07-2010 a las 08:40 -0400, Paul Fox escribió:
if so, it's the
first large-scale usage of the new suspend-or-shutdown menu, so i'm
interested in reaction to that. for instance -- is shutdown really
the most often used menu item, now that the machine can
cpu_free = (idle + iowait) * 100 / sum(cpu_times_current)
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
already.
except that the the current calls are pretty ohm-specific, aren't they?
(i haven't looked at them in a while.)
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
offscreen to resize or else we get flashes on
# screen, and setting hide() doesn't allow resize moves
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org
the touch command -- the touch could change to opening the file
for writing, then closing.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
a stylus, for instance, and a fair amount of pressure.
but it's predictable, which is something you can't really say for
capacitive mode.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
., the opposite of managed or
requiring infrastructure.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
simon wrote:
On 05/06/2010 02:34 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
simon wrote:
Did we settle on the naming of the network. I was in favor of 'local
network' as that mimics well the range of the network for me. James
meant that this could be confused with 'localhost', if I remember
becomes the only member? again, due to the anonymous
nature of ad-hoc networks, i'm not sure i see the importance of
this. and we don't provide similar indication for the mesh.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
to be taking over the
platform. As bad as it may seem, now at least we've got a unified IPC
system with a consistent security model across many different daemons.
unified, perhaps, except that access from shell (last i looked)
was fairly inadequate.
paul
=-
paul fox, p
and
power off.
As we're there, how do we get rid of the useless UL screen with its ugly
inverted color scheme?
i believe the UL screen is mandated, but i don't know the details. i.e.,
we may not have a choice.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Sugar-devel
james wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 08:37:54PM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
so, can someone tell me (gently) why either of these techniques
is better than simply invoking /bin/reboot or /bin/shutdown?
(other than the fact that those will work even if hal isn't
running?)
Lets Sugar
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
