Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:32 AM Laura Vargas wrote: > 2017-09-14 7:23 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender : > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Laura Vargas >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> 2017-09-14 7:00 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:29 PM Laura Vargas wrote: 2017-09-13 22:10 GMT-05:00 Martin Abente : > >> I noticed that my PR review and merged by Ignacio, but it later was >> reverted by Sebastian again. >> > > Martin, > > Please check with

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] URGENT action needed

mind-boggling indeed. SL has been in GSoC and GCI for years. I'm not a board member but +1 for sure. On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Laura Vargas > wrote: > >> Walter, >> >> -1 since

Re: [Sugar-devel] GCI 2016 meetup: My experience

Awesome! :D On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:01 PM, James Cameron wrote: > Well done. Good pix. > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.netrek.org/ > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

I thought the community had the answer about why ASLOv2 failed! Personally, I would love to review Sam's ASLO. Best, Sam C. On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > One of the pre-summer tasks is to answer that question. > > > On May 19, 2017 5:51 PM,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] New ASLO Project Definition

Thanks all for the comments. Here are my replies: On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Tony Anderson wrote: >Hi Sam, > >Thanks for the proposal. Naturally this raises the question of the relationship >between your ASLOv3 and the GSOC project. Do you see two parallel

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

I just realized that proposal wasn't send to sugar-devel list. It was removed from the thread at some point. So I just forward the link again. Sorry for people subscribed to multiple lists. https://goo.gl/VEIzCr Best, Sam C. On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:06 PM, James Cameron

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] (Goals and Mission) with Microsoft in it?

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:47 AM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:23:55PM -0400, Samuel Cantero wrote: > > Samuel Cantero wrote: > > > we're going to try to build a new ASLO in GSoC which must ease > > > acti

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] (Goals and Mission) with Microsoft in it?

> > Samuel Cantero wrote: > > we're going to try to build a new ASLO in GSoC which must ease > > activities management, for both image builders and developers. > > Please also consider Sugar Network, which Sebastian knows about, and > is used heavily, judging by the h

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] (Goals and Mission) with Microsoft in it?

;Dave Crossland" <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > Do those xo run the latest release? > > On May 12, 2017 1:01 PM, "Samuel Cantero" <scante...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm not agree. In Paraguay, kids are still using a lot the python >> codebase and I guess we'

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] (Goals and Mission) with Microsoft in it?

I'm not agree. In Paraguay, kids are still using a lot the python codebase and I guess we're not the only one. We should work to find out a new release manager if Sam P can't make it anymore. Certainly there are many things to improve, but we shall overcome. I don't think solution is to discard

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities added to GithHub

I'm agree with Walter. We should move activities repos from git.sugarlabs.org to github.org with the whole commit history. It would be nice to keep all repos with same format in name and inside one Github organization exclusively dedicated for activities. Regards, On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 10:42

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Separate Emails

I understand and I am also agree that mailing list might be a barrier sometimes. Bernie and I would like to try mailman3 and hyperkitty. Check lists.fedoraproject.org. Issue, as always, is lack of time. Best regards, Sam C. On Mar 24, 2017 10:31 AM, "Samson Goddy"

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Services provided by Sugarlabs - Inventory - Maintainers

on jabber.sugarlabs.org but there was a reference to that as well. Best regards, On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:39 AM, Sam Parkinson <sam@sam.today> wrote: > On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 20:25 -0300, Samuel Cantero wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Currently we have two physical nodes - Justice and Fr

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Services provided by Sugarlabs - Inventory - Maintainers

/service is not being used and they will be shut down for a reasonable period of time until someone claim it. Later, machine/service will be removed. Best regards, On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Sebastian Silva <sebast...@fuentelibre.org> wrote: > On 19/02/17 10:35, Samuel Cantero wrote: &

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] #1018 infrastructure UNSP: do not open popups when "activities" link clicked on http://www.sugarlabs.org/ (was: Do not open "activities" link in popup window on http://www.

Fixed. On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Sugar Labs Bugs < bugtracker-nore...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: > #1018: do not open popups when "activities" link clicked on > http://www.sugarlabs.org/ > +--- > Reporter: alsroot

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Services provided by Sugarlabs - Inventory - Maintainers

docs. Would you like to add a maintainer page with this information? I'm adding some missing info below: On 18/02/17 18:25, Samuel Cantero wrote: *Jita*: - OS: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS - Maintainer: X. - Services provided: - network.sugarlabs.org, - node.sugarlabs.org (a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Services provided by Sugarlabs - Inventory - Maintainers

l, > > I wanted to make a few comments on just a few parts of this list. > >> Justice: >> >> 1. OS: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, >> 2. Maintainers: Bernie Innocenti, Sebastian Silva and Samuel Cantero. >> 3. Services (VMs running inside this node): > &

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Services provided by Sugarlabs - Inventory - Maintainers

On Feb 18, 2017 22:06, "Chris Leonard" <cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Samuel, I wanted to make a few comments on just a few parts of this list. > Justice: > > 1. OS: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, > 2. Maintainers: Bernie Innocenti, Sebastian Silva and Samuel Cantero

[Sugar-devel] Services provided by Sugarlabs - Inventory - Maintainers

machines, whether to find a new maintainer or to decommission the machine/service. *Justice*: 1. *OS*: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, 2. *Maintainers*: Bernie Innocenti, Sebastian Silva and Samuel Cantero. 3. *Services* (VMs running inside this node): - *amnesia:* - OS: Fedora 18. This OS has reached

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOB] Outreachy

Great! :) On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Avni Khatri wrote: > Excited to see Sugar Labs applying for this! > > On Feb 8, 2017, at 12:23 PM, Walter Bender > wrote: > > Unless I hear otherwise, I plan to submit an application to Outreachy [1] >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] [OUTAGE ALERT] Re: sugarlabs.org down ?

yes, freedom and justice are down and sunjammer is OK. Sebastian, do you have access to the console management? I've written to Bernie as well. Best regards, On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Sebastian Silva wrote: > Both our Freedom and Justice servers are

Re: [Sugar-devel] problem uploading to a.sl.o

Please, don't forget to clean your cache or try it in incognito mode. On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Samuel Cantero <scante...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Finally, I've decided to provide the XO files using > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/activities > > Now, our

Re: [Sugar-devel] problem uploading to a.sl.o

omeone try to upload a new app and download it again? Best regards, Samuel C. On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Samuel Cantero <scante...@gmail.com> wrote: > Guys, I've fixed it. I have also fixed email reset password. > > --- a/site/app/webroot/js/developers.js > +++ b/site/app/

Re: [Sugar-devel] problem uploading to a.sl.o

6:49:54PM -0300, Samuel Cantero wrote: > > +Aleksey +Bernie > > > > There's something I don't understand about activities. In > > /srv/www-sugarlabs/activities/site/app/config/config.php we define: > > > > define('FILES_HOST', 'http://download.sugarlabs.or

Re: [Sugar-devel] problem uploading to a.sl.o

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Aleksey Lim <m...@alsroot.su> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 06:49:54PM -0300, Samuel Cantero wrote: > > +Aleksey +Bernie > > > > There's something I don't understand about activities. In > > /srv/www-sugarlabs/activities/sit

Re: [Sugar-devel] problem uploading to a.sl.o

as user root and Aleksey as user alsroot (with sudo access). Best regards, On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Gonzalo Odiard <godi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry by the noise, is working now. > Many thanks to who have fixed it :) > > Gonzalo > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at

Re: [Sugar-devel] problem uploading to a.sl.o

. On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Samuel Cantero <scante...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's not true. Activities are there and I can download activities. > > Maybe Gonzalo is looking in the wrong place. > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gm

Re: [Sugar-devel] problem uploading to a.sl.o

That's not true. Activities are there and I can download activities. Maybe Gonzalo is looking in the wrong place. On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > I thought Sam restored that directory last week??? > > Something is seriously amiss. > > -walter >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Alias For Developement!

Pitifully, Gmail doesn't support email alias anymore, hence I have added a new account for Samson. Samson, you should have received an email with your SL account and password. Please change it as soon as possible as the email suggest and explain. Then you'll be able to use gmail or hotmail as

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Alias For Developement!

Let's write to the gmail support team. Apparently if you don't have an internal google account you can't create aliases anymore. They don't give you the option for "Send Verification" anymore. On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Chihurumnaya Ibiam < ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com> wrote: > With my

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Alias For Developement!

Samson, can you provide me your gmail account and try the link provided by Dave? On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > I recommend using gmail; https://support.google.com/ > mail/answer/22370?hl=en > ___ Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] ASLO not working?

Yes. We did an upgrade last weekend and ASLO is broken right now. We are going to fix it ASAP. On Jul 14, 2016 10:45 AM, "Martin Abente" wrote: > Hey guys, > > Is there something wrong with ASLO? The website is up but no activities > are displayed. > > Thanks, >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Maintenance downtime today for OS upgrades

Hi all, We had some issues with the docker upgrade, mainly with the btrfs fs. I had to remove all of the btrfs subvolumes. I had to recreate every container again (which is not a problem). bugs.sl.o and bundlebin.sl.o are running again, but I could not find the container for socialhelp.sl.o. All

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem in sending email

I have checked that someone has already processed your request. I guess Sebastian. Best regards, Samuel C. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Samson Goddy wrote: > I just noticed that i can't send mail to the SLOB email address, sometimes > my mail get rejected by the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] trac breakage

. Please, if you find something broken just let me know. In the worst case scenario, we have a backup of our previous database. Best regards, Samuel Cantero. On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for digging into this. > > FWIW, I am f

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] trac breakage

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:21 PM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 08:49:15AM -0300, Samuel Cantero wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:39 AM, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 02

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] trac breakage

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:39 AM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 02:32:36AM -0300, Samuel Cantero wrote: > > Regarding to the inability to access the user page, I've checked our > > current users and I found 97426 users. We had a lot o

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] trac breakage

RecaptchaRegisterPlugin [2] https://github.com/scanterog/trac-recaptcharegister [3] https://trac-hacks.org/ticket/12228 [4] https://github.com/scanterog/acct_mgr-0.4.4 On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Samuel Cantero <scante...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Walte

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] trac breakage

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Sam Parkinson > wrote: > >> Hi Walter, >> >> The immediate issues with trac (and also socialhelp) sending emails is a >> configuration issue. Right now

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Planned system maintenance on Sunjammer starting NOW

gt; A big thank you to Rubén Rodríguez of the Free Software Foundation for > > staying online all Sunday to support us during the transition. Also big > > kudos to Samuel Cantero who stayed up until 1AM to lead the second stage > > of the upgrade and cleanup the considerable fallou

[Sugar-devel] Sugar osbuild problem

Hello guys, I was trying to setup the development environment but there was a problem with the command "./osbuild pull". It can not find the www.sugarlabs.org/~buildbot/broot/last-x86_64-master. This is because currently www.sugarlabs.org is pointing to freedom and no more to sunjammer. The

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] [Announcing] an extra UNSTABLE 0.105.3 release (code-frozen)

Hi Bernie, It looks like you're right. Maybe there is something wrong with our DKIM public key. I have checked the header from one message coming from lists.sugarlabs.org. Gmail shows me the next result from the DKIM test: dkim=temperror (no key for signature) header.i=@lists.sugarlabs.org