Dear Sucrose Maintainers,
please provide source tarballs for the Sucrose 0.88.1 bug fix release
[1] by the end of today June 3rd and announce them as explained at
[2].
This will be our first bug fix release, so please be extra careful to
not introduce any regressions and have your changes well
= bernie
smtpssl = true
---cut---
The .gitaliases is a big time saver. For Sugar, I have the following
entries:
---cut---
alias silbe Sascha Silbe si...@sugarlabs.org
alias tomeu Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net
alias erikos Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de
alias mstone
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 03:57, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:19:08AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 06:39, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:17:32AM +, Sascha Silbe wrote:
While you're at it, can you
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 15:50, mabente mabe...@paraguayeduca.org wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 11:35:31 +1000, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
What does this do?
What is it for?
Otherwise it won't let the user select the username at the first boot. :)
The idea of using GConf for it is that
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 06:39, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:17:32AM +, Sascha Silbe wrote:
While you're at it, can you avoid the escaping by using different
quotes and replace % with , (for consistency with our style
guidelines - it doesn't really make a
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:44, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:48:17PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
== Changes I would like to see ==
* Having _all_ reviews in the mailing list. The process already allows
patches to be sent and discussed in the mailing list
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 09:23, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:47:10AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
I am trying to use the keys with the circles with diferent sizes to
change the size of the tool, but didn't see any event.
Can anybody help me?
I've tried what
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 20:24, Johannes Ponader
johannespona...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I'm working on a vocabulary/maths/knowlegde training activity, first
releases under http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/honeypot
Now I want to store user data inside a database and have to make a
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 01:51, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, you can access the DOM from python. Google for extra info. If you
can't find anything, I did something similar in my last year's
project, which you can find here
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 01:58, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
In case you don't already know, I'm doing a GSoC project on improving
the browser engine situation in Sugar
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2010/AbstractBrowser
My exams haven't finished yet (last one
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 21:56, Thomas Gilliard satel...@attglobal.net wrote:
Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
May be installing gnome-python2-evince ?
Looks like libevince changed APIs?
Regards,
Tomeu
That may be it.. Read now starts to Choose and Object screen.
now get error:
AttributeError:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 00:17, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes! Prepare your teams!
It will be good to find easy workarounds that can be deployed by just
upgrading Read, but we should also try to push the proper fixes to
GNOME.
That will require higher technological skills, but this
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 13:48, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Hi,
would be good to reach some consensus and finally change the review
process as defined in
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Code_Review
Alternatively, we can stay with the same process and discuss
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 23:12, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Tue, 25-05-2010 a las 19:16 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió:
Is F-11 still the base OS for this?
Unfortunately, this build is still based on
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 17:48, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Hi David,
thanks a lot for putting some new energy on this discussion, there's
certainly more opportunities for us in revising this process
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 21:46, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 03:18:47PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 03:10:52PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 23:48, Sugar Labs Bugs
bugtracker-nore...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
#1686
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 23:15, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
I'm unsure of the reasons for the change.
Instead of setting DISPLAY and SUGAR_EMULATOR_PID environment variables
repeatedly for each attempt to run Xephyr, set the variables once.
But that's what the patch does, moves
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 23:21, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
On 19.05.2010, at 14:15, James Cameron wrote:
each attempt to run Xephyr
Just want to mention that I've been using the VNC-based Sugar emulator for
quite a while, and it works much better than Xephyr.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:56, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:47:35AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
I want them to stop doing redundant work,
Please tell me if I'm doing redundant work, and I'll back off. It is
often difficult to know what work is being done
Hi,
would be good to reach some consensus and finally change the review
process as defined in
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Code_Review
== Changes I would like to see ==
* Having _all_ reviews in the mailing list. The process already allows
patches to be sent and discussed in
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:51, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:49 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:26:15AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
From 0f99bd0b5d6d03dfe6673d944764a9346427dee1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gonzalo
Hi David,
thanks a lot for putting some new energy on this discussion, there's
certainly more opportunities for us in revising this process.
For background, Bernie and me talked on the phone last week and it
helped a lot in aligning our positions on this. When we get the
community team up and
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 00:52, Edward Cherlin echer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:42, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
==Sugar Digest==
One of the nice things as you walk through the museum is that on
almost every wall is a quote about play. They have a nice
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 20:03, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
I have been thinking about how the olpc mesh network and the default
adhoc network can coexist.
From a user point of view, I think the
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 14:11, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Fri, 21-05-2010 a las 23:01 -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis escribió:
Simple and quite effective :-)
Changing MAX_COLUMNS to 4 in
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/jarabe/controlpanel/gui.py did the trick.
And still has
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 01:13, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Fri, 21-05-2010 a las 18:18 +0100, Gary C Martin escribió:
Sure, what do I need to change from my side? In git.sugarlabs.org
I could find no way
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 02:04, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
david wrote:
As Bernie announced, we working on supporting Sugar .88 on the XO-1.
hi david --
for those of us joining this thread late, can you expand on
Hi,
while we stay with the current review process, other maintainers may
find useful to set up a page similar to this one:
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/wiki/TomeuReviewQueue
Generated with just this line:
Sascha,
just a heads up that the jhbuild instructions summarized in
sugar/README have changed and you may want to check you agree with
them.
Regards,
Tomeu
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:21, Sugar Labs Bugs
bugtracker-nore...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
#1823: README refers to obsolete info
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 14:30, Sugar Labs Bugs
bugtracker-nore...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
#1755: sugar-emulator: better error message if X server is unreachable
--+-
Reporter: sascha_silbe | Owner:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 06:47, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 04:26:44PM -0300, Daniel Castelo wrote:
I have this ticket pending, could you give your feedback? Thanks!!!
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1759
This patch improves the feature 3G Support (added in
Hi,
reviews appreciated.
Thanks,
Tomeu
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
From: Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org
---
src/jarabe/util/emulator.py | 13 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/jarabe/util/emulator.py b/src/jarabe/util/emulator.py
index 3eb817f..4155985 100644
--- a/src/jarabe/util/emulator.py
+++ b/src/jarabe
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 23:48, Sugar Labs Bugs
bugtracker-nore...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
#1686: Accessibility - virtual keyboard
--+-
Reporter: earias | Owner: tomeu
Type: defect
Do we have a maintainer for Paint?
Regards,
Tomeu
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 03:48, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@gmail.com wrote:
From 9595fdfcd0c1b26eab566223ecc1ede348c084e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@aronax.(none)
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 22:47:47 -0300
Subject: [PATCH]
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 23:07, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Mon, 17-05-2010 a las 09:24 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 20:07, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
This was also supposed to be posted on the list:
- Mensaje reenviado
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 20:07, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
This was also supposed to be posted on the list:
- Mensaje reenviado
De: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
Para: Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org
Cc: Sayamindu Dasgupta sayami...@gmail.com, de
on the mailing list may be enough, unless we
are expecting that people won't vote freely without anonymity.
Finally, many thanks to Tomeu Vizoso and Simon Schampijer for their
great work as the Development Team Lead and Release Manager!
Thanks to you for taking this important task, I'm very happy to see
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 07:14, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 04:33:48PM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
This patchset implements sorting in the Journal UI as described in [0].
This feature was requested in [1] and sponsored by Activity Central [2].
Sorting by
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 00:02, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Fri, 14-05-2010 a las 08:59 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
I'm just asking for someone to propose a set of concrete and coherent
changes to the current process, is it really asking too much?
I'm sorry but I cannot go
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 15:51, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:40 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Hi,
sorry for getting late to this discussion, have been traveling this weekend.
It is unfortunate that you were unable to join us. Obviously
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 16:45, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi Tomeu,
I actually stepped down as development team coordinator which
is/was an administrative role, I wasn't the development team
leader because that position has never existed before in our
community. I tried to
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 22:07, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Thu, 13-05-2010 a las 20:23 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
This implies that we are using the old process because nobody has come
with a concrete proposal for changing it. AFAICS, the discussion has
stalled because
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 18:47, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Wed, 12-05-2010 a las 14:24 -0300, Daniel Drake escribió:
On 11 May 2010 20:23, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Would you like me to go on and apply any relevant patches also to the
devel and F-13
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 18:47, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Wed, 12-05-2010 a las 14:24 -0300, Daniel Drake escribió:
On 11 May 2010 20:23, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Would you like me to go on and apply any relevant patches also to the
devel and F-13
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 20:15, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Thu, 13-05-2010 a las 19:30 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
Are your patches in this queue?
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/query?status=acceptedstatus=assignedstatus=newstatus=reopenedorder=prioritycol=idcol=summarycol
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:38, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:52:49AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
I don't see though how we'd link patches to bug reports and feature
specs, do we have a way for that? IME is very useful when you dive
into a new codebase
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:52, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
The ASLO[1] is based on Sugar Platform[2] idea when if activity
developer wants to be sure that activity will start, just declares
Sugar Platform range e.g. 0.82-0.88. This scheme is simple - users
need to know
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 13:42, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 09:35 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:38, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:52:49AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
I don't see though how we'd link
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 14:10, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 07:42 -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
How about just pasting the link to the patchwork thread manually when
closing the bug? It would save some developer time if we had a
post-receive hook for
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 16:21, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 14:35 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Obsessed and pedantry don't help at all in this discussion, please
try to be fair to the people you discuss with and avoid adding
unnecessary drama.
If you don't
Hi,
I don't have much time these days, so I'm dropping the development
team coordinator role in order to have a bit more of time to focus on
the other stuff.
I have added the following description to the Vacancies page:
* Development team coordinator: carries administrative tasks such as
/ OLPC ecosystem. (I
am already seeing your name pop up around gnome:)
Thanks, I'm still a maintainer and peer of some modules, so for now
I'm sticking around.
Regards,
Tomeu
david
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Hi,
I don't have much time
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 23:55, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:49:23PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
We are also scheduling some time to go through the review queue on
Tuesday May 11th afternoon (UTC) and on Monday May 17th. Would be
great
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 06:34, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
I've installed patchwork and primed it with the last 2 months of mailing
list archives:
http://patchwork.sugarlabs.org/
The result looks very neat. If we're nostalgic of the rigid workflow of
bug trackers, each patch
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:05, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:13:38AM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
On Thursday 06 May 2010 02:14:44 am you wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 04:33:48PM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
snip
As current datastore and journal
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:56, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:15:12AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:05, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:13:38AM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
On Thursday 06 May
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:18, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:04:38PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:56, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:15:12AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 09:37, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 07:25:12PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
To reclaim space in case of a crash, we also need to delete temporary
files at startup time. The rest of the bug is addressed by a separate
patch in
Hi,
Simon and me discussed when to release 0.88.1 and are targeting for
May 18, thus having tarballs ready on May 17. Do the other maintainers
agree?
We are also scheduling some time to go through the review queue on
Tuesday May 11th afternoon (UTC) and on Monday May 17th. Would be
great if
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 04:40, Tim McNamara paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz wrote:
Hi all,
Am seeking clarification on coding style, notably the use of trailing white
space punctuation.
import gettext as _
...
_(Enter your name: ) = Generally used
_(Enter your name)+: = Best for translators,
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 02:12, Mohan Raj R mohanraj@gmail.com wrote:
I was watching this video and thought that it makes a lot of sense to have
this feature in Sugar
http://www.autodeskresearch.com/publications/toolclips#video
Thoughts ?
I guess this would overlap somewhat with Tutorious?
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 22:00, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Fri, 30-04-2010 a las 10:49 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
What's the problem with plain email reviews that we're trying to solve
with bug trackers and fancy review tools?
It's useful to have the patches tracked
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 18:49, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Wed, 28-04-2010 a las 18:41 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
Several contributors are hindered or even put off by the current
process. It often takes more time to handle mere technicalities (save
patch to file, create
do their part.
Regards,
Tomeu
-- Forwarded message --
From: Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de
Date: Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:50
Subject: Re: [IAEP] getting things done (was Re: [Sugar-devel]
Language Learner, a GSOC2010 idea proposal)
To: Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 22:10, Sayamindu Dasgupta sayami...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
There already is a mostly complete pywebkitgtk activity, Surf.
There has been a lot of debate on whether webkit is better than gecko
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 23:21, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 23 April 2010 15:02, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org
wrote:
I like the proposal of renaming Keep to Copy and placing it in the
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:53, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Is there yet any plans for migrations from GConf to GSettings in the
0.90 development of Sugar? I'm not sure if there's even any
requirements but I've noticed in maintaining of the packages there's a
dep on it.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 16:25, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Today I filed a bug to keep track of an issue that has been bothering me
for a long time:
There's interest from the people at La Rioja on this, how can we agree
on a plan together and resource it?
Hi!
Bernie, Tomeu and I had a nice discussion regarding the Code Review
process on #sugar yesterday. To sum it up:
Several contributors are hindered or even put off by the current
process. It often takes more time to handle mere technicalities (save
patch to file, create ticket in Trac,
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 03:46, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 18:26 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
We'd like to try a different approach that's used by many successful
projects - both small and large ones.
Patches are sent to sugar-devel for review. Every Sugar
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 18:48, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 05:04:21PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 02:06, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
what I seek: A political decision from a release team, maintained at some
location easy
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 13:40, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:15:54PM +0100, Lucian Branescu wrote:
Unfortunately, I'm quite busy now with a school project and work, and I
have to revise for exams. If I find time, I'll have a look at that.
Thanks.
School
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:59, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
dir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Esteban
Take a look at the eatboom activity, it's an sketch to develop
activities based on .swf files, thanks to the work of tomeu and
wadeb.
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4225
i
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 16:11, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Hi Sugar developers (and Mike),
Mike Hommey maintains Debian packaging of xulrunner.
I asked him about the use of hardcoded rpath in Hulahop, which is generally
a bad idea and its use is being hunted down in Debian.
He had
Hi Jose,
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 16:38, Jose Camallonga josek...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm Jose a computer science student of FIB (http://www.fib.upc.edu/en.html).
We are developing an activity for Sugar and our director told us to ask here
for a review of our code. Is that
Hi,
I have been asked some questions privately about the GSoC assignment
but I don't have enough time to answer them.
I recommend all applicants to give a good read to
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Regards,
Tomeu
___
Sugar-devel
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 02:06, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:21:50AM +1100, James Cameron wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 12:34:26AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I can go hunt down the info at ASLO for each and every chunk of code
related to Sugar in some
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 04:30, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:21 +1100, James Cameron wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:36:06PM -0300, mabente wrote:
So, what do you guys think?
I like it.
I presume it won't appear unless a school server is known?
I
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 03:46, Vimal Joseph vimaljos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to run the Physics activity as a standalone application?
I've tried that (Physics-4.tar.gz) and got the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File physics.py, line 129, in module
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 15:21, Daniel Castelo
dcast...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote:
I haven't made any relevant progress in this feature. As I said in my last
email, I don't know if community has reached a concensus about this feature.
With gtk-print we could quite easily print from Read and
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 20:06, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Frederick Grose fgr...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Design_Team/Specifications/Groups
See http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Design_Team/Proposals/Groups
Thanks for the
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 21:16, Esteban Arias ear...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote:
hi,
source on 0.82:
https://desarrollo.ceibal.edu.uy/projects/respaldodiario/files
couldn't access that URL, anybody else outside LATU can?
Regards,
Tomeu
we in uruguay could be adapt to 0.84 (to image of
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 17:25, Gabriel Eirea gei...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/4/8 Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 21:16, Esteban Arias ear...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy
wrote:
hi,
source on 0.82:
https://desarrollo.ceibal.edu.uy/projects/respaldodiario/files
couldn't access
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 22:41, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Hi Sugar developers,
I am wondering: Who maintains Hulahop?
The code currently works in Debian only because I leave alone a hardcoded
rpath, which I am told is bad.
As I understand it, Ubuntu has a hard time getting the
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Chirag Jain chi...@seeta.in wrote:
Hi,
The link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/ is not working for last two days.
I have heard this may be related with DNS problems in your ISP, you
may want to try using a different DNS server.
Regards,
Tomeu
Regards
On Thu, Apr
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:35, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
This might be the sweeties Easter egg ever!
The new shining version of the sweet learning environment is available.
Many people from all over the world have been working together over the
last six months to make this
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-base/sugar-base-0.88.0.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Updated translations
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.88.0.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Updated translations
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.88.0.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Revert copy to Journal palette item in journal details view #1831
* Updated translations
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-artwork/sugar-artwork-0.88.0.tar.bz2
== News ==
* No changes, just bump version number
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-presence-service/sugar-presence-service-0.88.0.tar.bz2
== News ==
* s-p-s exits if system bus cannot be accessed #1401
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-115.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Updated translations
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Write/Write-69.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Updated translations
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 14:26, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 10:14 +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
However, it looks like it would take a couple of months of effort to get
I think you
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 16:24, Yevlempy(Harsh Verma) yevle...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I Would like to propose GSOC 2010 idea for Sugarlabs.
The Proposal
I would like to propose an idea of Integrating LDTP with sugar.
Gnome/LDTP[1]
(Linux Desktop Testing Project) seem to be doing this
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:15, Carlos mauro unima...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
My name is Carlos Mauro. I'm a master student from Perú. I send this idea to
Sugar for this GSoC. Friends,I wait the feedback.
http://idea.sugarlabs.org/drupal5/ideatorrent/idea/28/
Peaceful Revolution
This is a
I'm a bit confused, is the problem reliable full restore with limited
local space or the DS having the xapian DB open while the copy
happens? Or both?
Thanks,
Tomeu
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 00:51, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
In Paraguay, we started discussing the topic of
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 20:03, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:46:14PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
The fix is easy and I tested it as working [2]. I think Sayamindu tested
it, too.
+1
+1
This is a good example of how seemingly simple and
Hi Manjot,
unfortunately don't have lots of time to invest in your project,
though I think it's a very valuable one.
It's very likely that the other people that could help you won't have
as well lots of time, because there are many other people who want to
do things with Sugar and Pitivi and
401 - 500 of 1539 matches
Mail list logo
