>
>
> I had completely missed the chart activity, glad you mentioned it. Help is
> a strange case, it is was never submitted to ASLO.
>
>
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4051
repository:
https://github.com/godiard/help-activity
Other activities still in my personal github:
>
> fonts-1.xo
>
If this refer to http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4669
ther repository is:
https://github.com/godiard/favorite-fonts-activity
I can transfer it to sugarlbas if needed.
About all this movement, two comments (just ahumble opinion of a retired
sugar devel)
*
Hi, James
Thanks. I think we are getting to a productive discussion.
I doubt if there are many who have updated the activity.info to link to
a personal repository (not an organization repository). However,
certainly those requests should be honored.
If a developer has his own private (not
Yes, I'm familiar with the ASLO hosting directory on
download.sugarlabs.org with the (currently) four digit identification.
Your understanding is incomplete and to some extent in error.
Implode should not be forked from git.sugarlabs.org, as the current
maintainer has a public copy in their
Apparently my English is a bit garbled. I apologize.
What I am doing is going down the list of activities on ASLO as shown in
download.sugarlabs.org where each activity is given a four digit
'add-on' identification.
There were 137 with repositories already on github. For these, the
needed
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:48:16AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> 1. The original repository is ASLO.
No, the originals were mostly on laptop.org and on developer web
sites, including Gitorious and GitHub.
> The git.sugarlabs.org was added later.
No, the Sugar Labs Gitorious instance was set up
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:21:40AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Hi James, Walter
>
> I reviewed the 71 activities for which I created a repository in
> github/ sugarlabs.
>
> Of these 47 are not duplicates to repositories on git.sugalabs.org.
But you omit repositories in other than
1. The original repository is ASLO. The git.sugarlabs.org was added
later. The intent, as I understand it, is to have the master source code
under git version control on github as a replacement for
git.sugarlabs.org. The git record of the programming change from version
to version should be
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:21:21PM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 2017 7:08 PM, "James Cameron" <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
>
> We cannot host repositories on GitHub that don't have a license.
>
> That was true in the early days of github but it's no longer
> true. In fact
On Apr 23, 2017 11:21 PM, "Tony Anderson" wrote:
Hi James, Walter
I reviewed the 71 activities for which I created a repository in
github/sugarlabs
Thank you Tony!
Unless I hear to the contrary, I'll delete these duplicates.
Sounds good to me
My understanding from the
Hi James, Walter
I reviewed the 71 activities for which I created a repository in
github/sugarlabs.
Of these 47 are not duplicates to repositories on git.sugalabs.org.
The duplicates are:
abecedarium-5.xo
amazonas_tortuga-2.xo
analyze_journal-5.xo
analyze-8.xo
anno-1.xo
annotate-1.xo
On Apr 23, 2017 7:08 PM, "James Cameron" wrote:
We cannot host repositories on GitHub that don't have a license.
That was true in the early days of github but it's no longer true. In fact
it's a big problem, because a lot of stuff is posted on github without a
libre license
Dissent.
1.
For the duplication by Tony from activities.sugarlabs.org to
github.com/sugarlabs;
- for the commit history, we still have the original repository for
some activities.
- for the source code, now we have two places for some activities; the
original repository, and a copy with a
13 matches
Mail list logo