Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Terminal-38

2012-06-01 Thread Rafael Ortiz
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > > The offered version in ASLO is based on the browser User Agent, only > > in Browse GTK+3 you will get activities that claim 0.96. > > Right, so I am on Fedora 16 on my non-XO lapt

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Terminal-38

2012-06-01 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > The offered version in ASLO is based on the browser User Agent, only > in Browse GTK+3 you will get activities that claim 0.96. Right, so I am on Fedora 16 on my non-XO laptop, so it is using some fallback logic. Anyway, can the activity

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Terminal-38

2012-06-01 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2012/6/1 Gonzalo Odiard : > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Martin Langhoff > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Sascha Silbe >> wrote: >> > Gonzalo Odiard writes: >> > >> >> I think is not a good idea publish a activity with serious regressions >> >> like >> >> this. >> > >> > +1

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Terminal-38

2012-06-01 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Sascha Silbe > wrote: > > Gonzalo Odiard writes: > > > >> I think is not a good idea publish a activity with serious regressions > like > >> this. > > > > +1 > > > > Anyone interested in the current state o

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Terminal-38

2012-06-01 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote: > Gonzalo Odiard writes: > >> I think is not a good idea publish a activity with serious regressions like >> this. > > +1 > > Anyone interested in the current state of development can clone the git ASLO allows to mark it "experimental", and thi

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Terminal-38

2012-06-01 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Drop was possible from the clipboard objects in the frame to the terminal. Gonzalo On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:40 PM, S. Daniel Francis wrote: > > == known issues == >> * http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/3645 (Saving data in the journal). >> * http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/3655 (Drag and drop n

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Terminal-38

2012-06-01 Thread Sascha Silbe
Gonzalo Odiard writes: > I think is not a good idea publish a activity with serious regressions like > this. +1 Anyone interested in the current state of development can clone the git repository and use "./setup.py dev". For everybody else it's going to be a rather bad surprise. Especially sinc

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Terminal-38

2012-05-31 Thread S. Daniel Francis
> == known issues == > * http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/3645 (Saving data in the journal). > * http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/3655 (Drag and drop not working) > Drag and drop will be a new utility, the terminal was connected to a drag and drop callback, but it was not the drag and drop clipboa

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Terminal-38

2012-05-31 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
> > >> > I have been following the gtk3 process very closely and this is not have > been the case for other activities, even more so when we still have > upstream bugs un resolved, what I'm trying to say is that (as we all know) > 0.96 is a not suitable version for wide-spread use, these releases k

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Terminal-38

2012-05-31 Thread Rafael Ortiz
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Rafael Ortiz > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: >> >>> I think is not a good idea publish a activity with serious regressions >>> like this. >>> It's good have t

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Terminal-38

2012-05-31 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Rafael Ortiz wrote: > > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > >> I think is not a good idea publish a activity with serious regressions >> like this. >> It's good have the patches in the repository, >> but it's only a start, we should publish

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Terminal-38

2012-05-31 Thread Rafael Ortiz
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > I think is not a good idea publish a activity with serious regressions > like this. > It's good have the patches in the repository, > but it's only a start, we should publish a version when the functionality > is similar to the GTK2 versio

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Terminal-38

2012-05-31 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
I think is not a good idea publish a activity with serious regressions like this. It's good have the patches in the repository, but it's only a start, we should publish a version when the functionality is similar to the GTK2 version, if not, this will be a very confusing route for our users. Gonza

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Terminal-38

2012-05-31 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4043 Sugar Platform: 0.96 - 0.96 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28085/terminal-38.xo Release notes: First release of GTK 3 based activity, thanks to the work of Agustin, Daniel, Manuel, Gonzalo and Humitos. Co