2010/2/11 Simon Schampijer :
> On 01/29/2010 12:00 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 14:57, Daniel Castelo
>> wrote:
>>> As I told before I have made some improvements to this feature: tickets
>>> 1652-"Add Connection Information" and 1654-"Add Pin/Puk Configuration" (i
>>> wrote
On 01/29/2010 12:00 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 14:57, Daniel Castelo
> wrote:
>> As I told before I have made some improvements to this feature: tickets
>> 1652-"Add Connection Information" and 1654-"Add Pin/Puk Configuration" (i
>> wrote this in the feature page).
>> To ad
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:59:44AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 18:57, Gary C Martin wrote:
> > If the GSM device is not yet configured via the CP, should the
> > device palette just report that as the error (ideally with an entry
> > to jump to the CP, but that can be a fu
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 14:57, Daniel Castelo
wrote:
> As I told before I have made some improvements to this feature: tickets
> 1652-"Add Connection Information" and 1654-"Add Pin/Puk Configuration" (i
> wrote this in the feature page).
> To add Pin/Puk configuration support I need to handle the
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 18:57, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 27 Jan 2010, at 15:25, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 16:06, Eben Eliason wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Simon Schampijer
>>> wrote:
I had a chance to apply the latest code that is attached in #1622 and
As I told before I have made some improvements to this feature: tickets
1652-"Add Connection Information" and 1654-"Add Pin/Puk Configuration" (i
wrote this in the feature page).
To add Pin/Puk configuration support I need to handle the "Authentication
Error". Now i am setting the message "Authenti
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:06:48AM -0500, Eben Eliason wrote:
> This sounds like a good time to revive the global notification idea.
> The design intent there was to each corner of the screen with one edge
> of the Frame (lower-right would be devices), and to have notification
> icons (the device i
On 27 Jan 2010, at 15:25, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 16:06, Eben Eliason wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Simon Schampijer
>> wrote:
>>> I had a chance to apply the latest code that is attached in #1622 and played
>>> a bit with a gsm-device. I think we discussed th
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 16:06, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> I had a chance to apply the latest code that is attached in #1622 and played
>> a bit with a gsm-device. I think we discussed this already in some parts
>> before but I am still not su
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> I had a chance to apply the latest code that is attached in #1622 and played
> a bit with a gsm-device. I think we discussed this already in some parts
> before but I am still not sure about the following:
>
> With my device attached I see
I had a chance to apply the latest code that is attached in #1622 and
played a bit with a gsm-device. I think we discussed this already in
some parts before but I am still not sure about the following:
With my device attached I see the modem and hit 'connect' in the device
palette. I get no fee
Here is a mockup of the panel with a proposed icon and a few visual
tweaks, as promised. Sorry it took a week to find the time. I'm happy
to export any of the icons shown as needed, once a design is agreed
upon.
Eben
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 02:36 PM, Daniel Castelo wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Simon Schampijerwrote:
>>
>>> On 12/11/2009 08:36 PM, mabe...@paraguayeduca.org wrote:
It has been discussed before and i have been working on it with D
On 01/15/2010 02:36 PM, Daniel Castelo wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Simon Schampijerwrote:
>
>> On 12/11/2009 08:36 PM, mabe...@paraguayeduca.org wrote:
>>> It has been discussed before and i have been working on it with Daniel
>>> Castelo from Uruguay.
>>>
>>> This is the link of the
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 12/11/2009 08:36 PM, mabe...@paraguayeduca.org wrote:
> > It has been discussed before and i have been working on it with Daniel
> > Castelo from Uruguay.
> >
> > This is the link of the formal proposal, I will be updating it soon.
> >
On 12/11/2009 08:36 PM, mabe...@paraguayeduca.org wrote:
> It has been discussed before and i have been working on it with Daniel
> Castelo from Uruguay.
>
> This is the link of the formal proposal, I will be updating it soon.
>
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support
Hi Martin & Daniel
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 13:58, Daniel Castelo
wrote:
> I have improved this feature. I added the connection info "data sent
> /received" and "connection time". I am working now in adding the Pin/Puk
> configuration.
Looks great, when the initial patch gets in, I will review these two
patches of y
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 19:36, wrote:
> It has been discussed before and i have been working on it with Daniel
> Castelo from Uruguay.
>
> This is the link of the formal proposal, I will be updating it soon.
>
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support
I support this feature, has a clear
Maybe having something handling gconf value changes and then setting the
new value to the 'loaded' connection, that would be the best solution in my
opinion, so far.
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:08:02 -0200, Daniel Castelo
wrote:
> Yes, it isn't so bad. But wich would be the best solution? "refresh" th
Yes, it isn't so bad. But wich would be the best solution? "refresh" the
settings manager information or network manager information when you save
the configuration in the control panel?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:11 PM, mabente wrote:
> Yes, because the gsm connection is loaded once at system s
Yes, because the gsm connection is loaded once at system start, so
everytime the settings are changed a system restart is required. I tested
different loading times, (while clicking on connect item or when the device
its plugged) and i found the current moment simpler. because the other
requires a
I'm testing the feature. When you configure the connection the first time,
the system requires that you restart. This is fine?
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:36 PM, wrote:
> It has been discussed before and i have been working on it with Daniel
> Castelo from Uruguay.
>
> This is the link of the form
It has been discussed before and i have been working on it with Daniel
Castelo from Uruguay.
This is the link of the formal proposal, I will be updating it soon.
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@l
23 matches
Mail list logo
