On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Bernie Innocentiber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On second thought, we don't really need to split it: we might as well
rename it to sugar-utils and genericize it so it behaves nicely when not
running on the XO.
+1.
Also +1 on a UI display of this kind of info.
m
Any opinions? Every other deployer thinks this is a good idea?
Regards,
Tomeu
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:38, SugarLabs
Bugsbugtracker-nore...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
#1157: Show which jabber server to which you are connected
2009/8/12 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
Any opinions? Every other deployer thinks this is a good idea?
Yes. OLPC deployments have historically had this tool in the form of
olpc-netstatus which is indeed very useful. Sugar should provide an
equivalent.
I wouldn't say it's important to expose
El Wed, 12-08-2009 a las 16:31 +0545, Daniel Drake escribió:
2009/8/12 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
Any opinions? Every other deployer thinks this is a good idea?
Yes. OLPC deployments have historically had this tool in the form of
olpc-netstatus which is indeed very useful. Sugar
2009/8/12 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org:
Are you the current maintainer of olpc-utils? I used to be, but now I
don't feel like I have enough spare cycles to work on it.
I think so, but I don't have the time either.
However I get the feeling that olpc-utils is already XO-specific, or
very
5 matches
Mail list logo