Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Re: #1157 HIGH: Show which jabber server to which you are connected

2009-08-24 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Bernie Innocentiber...@codewiz.org wrote: On second thought, we don't really need to split it: we might as well rename it to sugar-utils and genericize it so it behaves nicely when not running on the XO. +1. Also +1 on a UI display of this kind of info. m

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Re: #1157 HIGH: Show which jabber server to which you are connected

2009-08-12 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Any opinions? Every other deployer thinks this is a good idea? Regards, Tomeu On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:38, SugarLabs Bugsbugtracker-nore...@sugarlabs.org wrote: #1157: Show which jabber server to which you are connected

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Re: #1157 HIGH: Show which jabber server to which you are connected

2009-08-12 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/8/12 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org: Any opinions? Every other deployer thinks this is a good idea? Yes. OLPC deployments have historically had this tool in the form of olpc-netstatus which is indeed very useful. Sugar should provide an equivalent. I wouldn't say it's important to expose

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Re: #1157 HIGH: Show which jabber server to which you are connected

2009-08-12 Thread Bernie Innocenti
El Wed, 12-08-2009 a las 16:31 +0545, Daniel Drake escribió: 2009/8/12 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org: Any opinions? Every other deployer thinks this is a good idea? Yes. OLPC deployments have historically had this tool in the form of olpc-netstatus which is indeed very useful. Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Re: #1157 HIGH: Show which jabber server to which you are connected

2009-08-12 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/8/12 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org: Are you the current maintainer of olpc-utils?  I used to be, but now I don't feel like I have enough spare cycles to work on it. I think so, but I don't have the time either. However I get the feeling that olpc-utils is already XO-specific, or very