2013/3/14 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org:
For example, what happens if a user who is on a proxy-free network
types hello into the proxy configuration textbox? Does that break
all networking?
Yes, setting proxy mode to Manual then typing hello in the first
input breaks networking in the current
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Anish Mangal an...@activitycentral.org wrote:
I'd like to propose Network proxy configuration in Sugar
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Proxy_configuration
I would say that this feature does not fit particularly nicely with
some items of our guidelines:
Daniel,
Your concerns are valid.
All I can say that probably using an automated transparent proxy
client-server setup is the answer, for getting the requirements met without
bothering the kids.
*
The automatic mode can be set in the XO-images, via simple OOB scripts.
*
The automatic mode puts
One problem that I have seen in various places, children untick theRadio
enable checkbox in Sugar's control panel and then return theirlaptop for
repair because they can't get online. I fear that proxyconfiguration could
become support headache like this.
Thinking in the same way, we must block
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
alan...@hotmail.com wrote:
One problem that I have seen in various places, children untick the
Radio enable checkbox in Sugar's control panel and then return their
laptop for repair because they can't get online. I fear that proxy
While I understand your point about the radio checkbox,
this show a few bugs or fails in design in Sugar too.
Trying right now I see:
* The text is confusing:
Turn off the wireless radio to save battery life
[] Radio
Checked is on or off? What means Radio? Is not clear
* After uncheck the
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
About the network proxy configuration, I agree is better have a automatic
configuration _if_possible_, but there are times when is not possible,
then we should provide a solution. Has been a request for a long time,
and
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:35:26 -0600
From: d...@laptop.org
To: gonz...@laptop.org
CC: alan...@hotmail.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org;
an...@activitycentral.com; alsr...@activitycentral.com
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURES][DESIGN] Network proxy configuration
On Thu, Mar 14
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org
wrote:
About the network proxy configuration, I agree is better have a automatic
configuration _if_possible_, but there are times when is not possible,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
While I understand your point about the radio checkbox,
this show a few bugs or fails in design in Sugar too.
Trying right now I see:
* The text is confusing:
Turn off the wireless radio to save battery life
[] Radio
I think this feature (proxy-config) is useful, just as the modem-config is,
which is included now.
dsd's brings a valid questioning of whether this kind of technical
features should be included or not. I think this particular matter requires
a broader discussion about how we could conciliate
But with modem-config a child cannot stop normal operation.
With proxy, the child can stop normal operation, in that no Browse
will work with wrong proxy.
I think proxy configuration should be an optional extension that is
disabled by default, allowing a deployment to enable it.
On Thu, Mar 14,
Is it different from relying on a modem and having a wrong modem-config?
I think there are scenarios where normal includes the proper
proxy-config, otherwise browse won't work either.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:33 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
But with modem-config a child cannot
I think proxy configuration should be an optional extension that is
disabled by default, allowing a deployment to enable it.
We can add a configuration to allow deployments to disable it.
Gonzalo
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
On 01/23/2012 03:05 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
On 23 January 2012 13:02, Gary Martingarycmar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Sridhar,
On 23 Jan 2012, at 01:08, Sridhar Dhanapalansrid...@laptop.org.au wrote:
On 19 January 2012 21:16, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de wrote:
If OLPC-AU
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 13:02 +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 01/23/2012 03:05 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
On 23 January 2012 13:02, Gary Martingarycmar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Sridhar,
On 23 Jan 2012, at 01:08, Sridhar Dhanapalansrid...@laptop.org.au wrote:
On 19 January 2012
Excerpts from Gary Martin's message of 2012-01-23 03:02:59 +0100:
Do you think this functionality could be folded into the Network CP UI or are
there a heap of inputs? We could make better use of Network CP horizontal
space regarding text blocks, and gain some vertical space to reduce
On 19 January 2012 21:16, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
If OLPC-AU has been telling their users to set the proxy via GNOME before
that is useful information. Other deployments might have set a proxy in the
build itself?
To confirm, we do tell users to configure their proxy using
Hi Sridhar,
On 23 Jan 2012, at 01:08, Sridhar Dhanapalan srid...@laptop.org.au wrote:
On 19 January 2012 21:16, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
If OLPC-AU has been telling their users to set the proxy via GNOME before
that is useful information. Other deployments might have set a
On 23 January 2012 13:02, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Sridhar,
On 23 Jan 2012, at 01:08, Sridhar Dhanapalan srid...@laptop.org.au wrote:
On 19 January 2012 21:16, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
If OLPC-AU has been telling their users to set the proxy via
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 01/18/2012 03:59 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 16:52 +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 21/11/11 21:27, Anish Mangal wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'd like to
On 01/18/2012 03:59 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 16:52 +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 21/11/11 21:27, Anish Mangal wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'd like to propose Network proxy configuration in Sugar
On 21/11/11 21:27, Anish Mangal wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'd like to propose Network proxy configuration in Sugar
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Proxy_configuration
- --
Anish Mangal
Hi Anish,
there have been discussions [1] on how this Feature works
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 16:52 +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 21/11/11 21:27, Anish Mangal wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'd like to propose Network proxy configuration in Sugar
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Proxy_configuration
- --
Anish
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'd like to propose Network proxy configuration in Sugar
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Proxy_configuration
- --
Anish Mangal
Dextrose Project Manager
Activity Central
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Yes, Sugar definitely needs this. There are probably many schools that use
proxy servers to control what the kids can browse, etc. and there needs to
be a simple way to set these up.
James Simmons
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Anish Mangal an...@activitycentral.orgwrote:
-BEGIN PGP
But don't forget that many deployments have solved this in build
customisation, so check that what you do doesn't break what they do.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
27 matches
Mail list logo
