Re: [Sugar-devel] [Feature] Problem Reports

2009-12-14 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 08:10:48PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: Sure, shouldn't be hard. It actually has no dependencies on the shell other than jarabe.controlpanel.sectionview.SectionView which the dialog is based on. What would I replace that with? maybe just a page for report dialog? it

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Feature] Problem Reports

2009-12-14 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 01:01:04PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 08:10:48PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: Sure, shouldn't be hard. It actually has no dependencies on the shell other than jarabe.controlpanel.sectionview.SectionView which the dialog is based on. What

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Feature] Problem Reports

2009-12-13 Thread James Cameron
Looks good ... though I haven't actually reviewed the patches. I hope you've thought about what will happen if people report problems that are part of the underlying software stack ... or even hardware. Perhaps a way for mass deployments to customise the destination for the problem report. --

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Feature] Problem Reports

2009-12-13 Thread Wade Brainerd
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 7:23 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: Looks good ... though I haven't actually reviewed the patches. I hope you've thought about what will happen if people report problems that are part of the underlying software stack ... or even hardware. It does bundle a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Feature] Problem Reports

2009-12-13 Thread Wade Brainerd
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:26 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 08:07:45PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 7:23 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: Looks good ... though I haven't actually reviewed the patches. I hope you've thought

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Feature] Problem Reports

2009-12-13 Thread Wade Brainerd
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:26 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 08:07:45PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 7:23 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: Looks good ...

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Feature] Problem Reports

2009-12-13 Thread James Cameron
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 09:32:50PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: Honestly, I really have no idea what kind of data we'll get through the feature. But any data is better than silence IMO. Agreed. Have you considered capturing non-problem experience reports as well? In OLPC testing at the moment

[Sugar-devel] [Feature] Problem Reports

2009-12-12 Thread Wade Brainerd
Hi all, Here is my feature proposal for Sugar Problem Reports. It's a quick way for users to provide feedback about Sugar. Reports automatically bundle relevant log files, and the PHP log server some simple scraping for Python exceptions, logger.error() calls, etc. The patches are all posted

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Feature] Problem Reports

2009-12-12 Thread Aleksey Lim
Wade, could you prepare shell agnostic code, it could be utilized in saccharin to report problems while downloading/compiling, so having the same UI would be useful. On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 08:47:05PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: Hi all, Here is my feature proposal for Sugar Problem Reports.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Feature] Problem Reports

2009-12-12 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 02:43:57AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: Wade, could you prepare shell agnostic code, it could be utilized in saccharin to report problems while downloading/compiling, so having the same UI would be useful. btw that could be another point for Shell UI Integration proposal,