On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Walter Bender
wrote:
> Done.
Wow! bravo Walter that was quick!!
Sean
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Walter Bender
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>>
>>> Fortunately, SLOBs votes are done via email, at any
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> Fortunately, SLOBs votes are done via email, at any time, and the monthly
>> SLOBs meetings are there to unjam any backlogs.
>
>
>
> ah I was
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Fortunately, SLOBs votes are done via email, at any time, and the monthly
> SLOBs meetings are there to unjam any backlogs.
ah I was under the impression that motions were debated and voted in the
meetings, with recourse
Hi
On 18 May 2016 at 11:53, Sean DALY wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> FWIW I think this is reasonable, since the board have shared and equal
>> financial responsibility for the Conservancy account.
>
>
> In my view it's
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> FWIW I think this is reasonable, since the board have shared and equal
> financial responsibility for the Conservancy account.
In my view it's theoretically reasonable, however there is a real risk of
red tape logjam. It's
On 18 May 2016 at 10:05, Walter Bender wrote:
> for some reason or other, the SFC seems to think that every outlay
> requires explicit approval from the entire board
FWIW I think this is reasonable, since the board have shared and equal
financial responsibility for the
7 matches
Mail list logo