For long-term security and support, we could adopt the Linux model: push
this concern down to the distributors and let them do a profitable
business out of it.
This creates a sustainable market for Sugar. Linux distributors who
have successfully built a reputation for offering good
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a Stick, OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick, etc. From time to time SLs
would decide to call and market as Sugar on a
But the idea is for SLs to market only Sugar on a Stick, whatever it
is based on.
Exactly. So what it is based on is (or should be) irrelevant to the
customers.
--
Philippe
--
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
Anonymous
On Sunday 20 September 2009 07:24:42
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
But the idea is for SLs to market only Sugar on a Stick, whatever it
is based on.
Exactly. So what it is based on is (or should be) irrelevant to the
customers.
Right, that's why the longer names such as Debian Sugar on a Stick
would refer to
I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
unanswered questions, present and future?
I sympathize since I'm also a bit confused. This is what
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
unanswered questions, present and future?
I
--
Philippe
--
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
Anonymous
On Sunday 20 September 2009 07:34:51 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
But the idea is for SLs to market only Sugar on a Stick, whatever it
is based on.
Exactly. So
El Sun, 20-09-2009 a las 09:33 -0500, Yamandu Ploskonka escribió:
Because of my ignorant ways in interpreting things, which I trust is
also the way of the populace :-), I think the wisest thing is to keep
the SOaS moniker as a basic SLs thing, of course, of course
recognizing Sebastian. I
Philippe Clérié wrote:
I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
unanswered questions, present and future?
I sympathize since I'm also a
9 matches
Mail list logo
