On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 03:28:11PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi all,
Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an
official answer on this. Soon.
Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs
distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux
2009/9/19 Chris Ball c...@laptop.org:
Should Sugar Labs be a Linux distributor, rather than just an
upstream producing Sugar releases?
Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and
refuse to endorse one over another?
Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:24, Daniel Draked...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallassebast...@when.com:
Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an
official answer on this. Soon.
Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 17:11, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote:
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:24, Daniel Draked...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallassebast...@when.com:
Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an
official
2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com:
Args! I notice that what I asked could have been misunderstood. I didn't
mean to imply SoaS being only way of distributing Sugar. That's out of
question and was never my intention. I apologize for any confusion if this
feeling has been created.
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Daniel Drake wrote:
I wonder, though, if the current SoaS is going to be the primary
LiveUSB distribution of Sugar supported by upstream (known as SoaS).
I think Sugar should treat all downstreams equally, so there would be no
primary distro. But users/deployments may
On 2009-09-16, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com:
I wonder, though, if the current SoaS is going to be the primary LiveUSB
distribution of Sugar supported by upstream (known as SoaS).
I think Sugar should treat all downstreams equally, so
2009/9/16 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
That's true for SoaS, Sugar and for any other FOSS project, but I
think it's a reasonable request to ask for some explicit commitment
from the umbrella organization, just to not have to switch orgs every
release.
What kind of commitment do you have
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 18:37, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/9/16 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
That's true for SoaS, Sugar and for any other FOSS project, but I
think it's a reasonable request to ask for some explicit commitment
from the umbrella organization, just to not have
2009/9/16 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
I cannot speak for Sebastian nor the whole SoaS community, but
something like making SoaS an official project in SLs could go a long
way. This would mean saying that Sugar on a Stick is a project with
this vision, this mission, this roadmap, this
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 18:58, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/9/16 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
I cannot speak for Sebastian nor the whole SoaS community, but
something like making SoaS an official project in SLs could go a long
way. This would mean saying that Sugar on a Stick
11 matches
Mail list logo
