On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 07:53, Elena of Valhalla
elena.valha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Oh, also users can review addons and rate then.
But the reviews may be in languages that another user isn't able to
read: having some
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:56:41PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
Since dependancy installation is not something most children can do,
If we reach that point, we've already failed (IMO).
CU Sascha
--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:56:41PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
Since dependancy installation is not something most children can do,
If we reach that point, we've already failed (IMO).I meant from an
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 08:42:16AM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
Since dependancy installation is not something most children can do,
If we reach that point, we've already failed (IMO).
I meant from an administrative perspective.
-v, please?
CU Sascha
--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:18, Carol Farlow Lerche c...@msbit.com wrote:
How does the Mozilla add-on functionality decide if there is a version or
platform conflict for browser add-ons? it must be a piece of the browser
that does this via some interaction with data on the server. Shouldn't
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:23, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:18, Carol Farlow Lerche c...@msbit.com wrote:
How does the Mozilla add-on functionality decide if there is a version or
platform conflict for browser add-ons? it must be a piece of the browser
How does the Mozilla add-on functionality decide if there is a version or
platform conflict for browser add-ons? it must be a piece of the browser
that does this via some interaction with data on the server. Shouldn't
there be a similar process here? It is frustrating to download something
After looking around I still can't find an automatic way to determine which
distribution/packaging universe a machine is in. /etc/*version gives a
somewhat useful but somewhat lying answer on my Ubuntu platform. It seems
an obvious thing to have uname report, but no go. What have I missed?
On
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Carol Farlow Lerche c...@msbit.com wrote:
After looking around I still can't find an automatic way to determine which
distribution/packaging universe a machine is in. /etc/*version gives a
somewhat useful but somewhat lying answer on my Ubuntu platform. It
Why not provide a dependency declaration in the activity file which can be
checked when the activity is installed? It could inform the user that a
particular package or library was needed. I understand that different
distros may package the dependencies differently, but it wouldn't be so bad
if
Luke Faraone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Carol Farlow Lerche c...@msbit.com wrote:
Why not provide a dependency declaration in the activity file which can be
checked when the activity is installed? It could inform the user that a
particular package or library was needed. I
11 matches
Mail list logo
