Bert Freudenberg wrote:
IMHO that activity should be a wrapper for Gnash, perhaps as a native
GTK+ application, without the browser baggage (maybe such a stand-alone
player does exist already?). Since the content is authored specifically
As Gnash was created originally as the UI layer for a
Hi,
This might be of interest: Salasaga is a GTK/Gnome based IDE used
to create eLearning for applications. With it, you take screenshots
of your applications, add highlights, text and external images,
then generate learning objects. Present output is in swf (flash)
format.
This might be of interest:
Salasaga is a GTK/Gnome based IDE used to create eLearning for
applications. With it, you take screenshots of your applications,
add highlights, text and external images, then generate learning
objects. Present output is in swf (flash) format.
It would certainly be
On 05.01.2009, at 05:24, John Watlington wrote:
On Jan 4, 2009, at 9:23 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote:
Currently Sugar is incapable of running software which is not
specifically designed for it.
Sugar runs simpler SWF applications just fine, through the Browser.
They don't have to be designed for
Wade Brainerd wrote:
I think the template should be built into and supported by the Sugar
dev team, rather than something that has to be copied around.
I strongly disagree. We should send the clearest possible message that
SWF, a language with no good free spec and no good free interpreter,
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
On 05.01.2009, at 05:24, John Watlington wrote:
On Jan 4, 2009, at 9:23 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote:
Currently Sugar is incapable of running software which is not
specifically designed for it.
Sugar runs simpler SWF
Wade Brainerd wrote:
just talking about shipping and supporting a 200 line
Gnash-based-activity launcher script, which can also launch Adobe if
it happens to be installed.
Assuming you can talk Adobe into giving you a standalone version of
their plugin...
- rob -
Hi,
When the primary mission - educating the world's least served children
- comes into conflict with Software Freedom, which one wins? How do
you explain that to the deployments?
This is a fine question. Here's my shot at it.
First, I think it would be a mistake to think that
Personally, I don't believe that Sugar Labs the organization needs to be
concerned with any of these four points.
The question is whether the Sugar *software* is flexible enough to adapt to
the needs of its users. Who are we to say what they should install, and
what tools they should use to make
9 matches
Mail list logo
