Hi
I agree completely
On Apr 2, 2017 7:52 PM, "Samuel Greenfeld" wrote:
> But what is a more proper port to Windows going to give us beyond what
> Lionel has already done by including Sugarizer in pretty much every major
> app store (including Microsoft's and Apple's)?
>
But what is a more proper port to Windows going to give us beyond what
Lionel has already done by including Sugarizer in pretty much every major
app store (including Microsoft's and Apple's)?
There is a cost associated with porting applications and their ongoing
maintenance. If Sugar is not
Having Sugar available on Windows 10 is important to establish its
reality as an alternative educational platform for educators. Educators
in Rwanda and the Philippines accept Windows as the software for
vocational preparation to the extent that the XO is not to be used for
secondary education
The short answer is yes; there are any number of ways (HTML app,
ActivePython .NET port, WSL, GTK for Windows, etc.) to port Sugar to
Windows.
Each has its own strengths and weaknesses.
The big question is if any of them are worth it.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Yatin Maan
Hey,
I understand that this is an April fool's joke but with introduction on
"Windows subsystem for Linux (WSL)"[1] I was wondering whether we might be
able to directly run sugar on Windows 10.
Someone here [2] even managed to get Unity and Xfce on WSL so I think it
might actually be possible to
No; with all the thoughts of porting XOs to Fedora.next and having to look
into ActivePython and such, I never got a chance to look into a proper
Sugar .NET conversion.
Besides with Sugarizer, we do not need a third language to maintain all the
activities in.
(It's amazing what you can do in
Look nice, that is awesome. Did you finish it?
On Apr 1, 2017 10:19 PM, "Samuel Greenfeld" wrote:
> Looking around, I found the following code online:
>
> http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2017/SugarNET.png
>
> It doesn't seem to do much more than my previous port did [*],
Looking around, I found the following code online:
http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2017/SugarNET.png
It doesn't seem to do much more than my previous port did [*], but it at
least compiles.
[*] http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2011/
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Samson Goddy
8 matches
Mail list logo