Hi Flavio,
I'm not sure what you are flagging as a mistake exactly, there is quite a
bit of confusion around android and html5, it means very different things
to different people. So it would be good if you could clarify.
And I'm not sure what you are proposing. Certainly everyone in this thread
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Flavio Danesse wrote:
> My humble opinion (please stick to one):
>
> To put into perspective the opinion, I should remember that besides
> developing for sugar since 2009, I am also a teacher in high school, so I've
> been inside ceibal classrooms during this time.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Flavio Danesse wrote:
> My humble opinion (please stick to one):
>
> To put into perspective the opinion, I should remember that besides
> developing for sugar since 2009, I am also a teacher in high school, so I've
> been inside ceibal classrooms during this time.
My humble opinion (please stick to one):
To put into perspective the opinion, I should remember that besides
developing for sugar since 2009, I am also a teacher in high school, so
I've been inside ceibal classrooms during this time.
>From the beginning, I said I saw the fate of sugar linked to t
Oh, awesome, COPR seems to be exactly what we need.
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> >
> wrote:
> > Going a bit off topic, but a pretty major issue I see in our workflow
> with
> > Fedora is that we don't have a good way to dev
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Going a bit off topic, but a pretty major issue I see in our workflow with
> Fedora is that we don't have a good way to develop unstable Sugar on a
> stable Fedora. Rawhide is, or at least is perceived as, unstable. And I'm
> not sure what wo
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Is 3D support for the BBB not planned/possible? I know we don't require it
> at the moment but it would be nice to have in the future (and it *might*
> speed up things even with the current software...).
It's only available via a closed sour
Yeah, my target here is development and testing, not final users.
Basically I'm talking about what Gonzalo has been doing for 0.100. We could
automate that work, it just feels a bit wrong to me because it's not using
the normal Fedora infrastructure...
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Walter Bender wr
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Going a bit off topic, but a pretty major issue I see in our workflow with
> Fedora is that we don't have a good way to develop unstable Sugar on a
> stable Fedora. Rawhide is, or at least is perceived as, unstable. And I'm
> not sure what wo
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Sorry for the top posting, quoting on gmail on iPhone is a pain.
>
> * I'm glad that you see some runway for the XO and I really hope you are
> right, it would be awesome. I think even just the uncertainity is a big
> issue for upstream devel
Going a bit off topic, but a pretty major issue I see in our workflow with
Fedora is that we don't have a good way to develop unstable Sugar on
a stable Fedora. Rawhide is, or at least is perceived as, unstable. And I'm
not sure what would be a good way to, for example, produce and
distribute 0.100
Is 3D support for the BBB not planned/possible? I know we don't require it
at the moment but it would be nice to have in the future (and it
*might* speed up things even with the current software...).
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Daniel Narva
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Do you know what's the status of graphics with the BeagleBone Black?
Sugar on the BBB should work fine with the modesetting driver OOTB
(I've still got some kernel bits to do in Fedora, 3.12 should be much
better) as it doesn't need 3D. The
Do you know what's the status of graphics with the BeagleBone Black?
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez
> >
> wrote:
> > On 4 November 2013 23:05, Peter Robinson
> > >
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sugar on Android or the Raspberry Pi might
Thanks a lot for the feedback Peter. I will check these out.
For the record, I was thinking about Sugar on Linux on Raspberry, not
Android.
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez
> >
> wrote:
> > On 4 November 2013 23:05, Peter Robi
Sorry for the top posting, quoting on gmail on iPhone is a pain.
* I'm glad that you see some runway for the XO and I really hope you are
right, it would be awesome. I think even just the uncertainity is a big
issue for upstream development at the moment. Not knowing if anyone is
going to build F2
Well, my impression is that at the moment we have a well defined
educational vision and a pretty solid UX design based on it. What we lack
is an hardware+software platform to run it on. So I don't think trying to
find a solution for that is getting "bogged down", all the contrary.
On Tuesday, 5 No
Thank you
I will join in from DC
Harriet
_
Harriet Vidyasagar
1-301-442-8991
www.monsoongrey.com
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
> We have a SLOB meeting scheduled for Monday, 4 November at 9AM EST
> (2PM GMT). Please join
18 matches
Mail list logo
