Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] The Future of Sugar on a Stick

2009-09-18 Thread Bill Bogstad
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: We already have de...@lists.laptop.org for OLPC, fedora-olpc-l...@redhat.com and others for Fedora,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] The Future of Sugar on a Stick

2009-09-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is: == Further separation between upstream and downstreams == Without artificially privileging nor discriminating any downstream. So a big +1 to giving a stronger identity to the SoaS project and to creating a separate mailing list.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] The Future of Sugar on a Stick

2009-09-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is: == Further separation between upstream and downstreams == Without artificially privileging nor discriminating any downstream. So a big +1 to giving a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] The Future of Sugar on a Stick

2009-09-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:10, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is: == Further separation between upstream and downstreams == Without artificially