On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Andrés Ambrois andresambr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 03 May 2009 06:29:26 pm Albert Cahalan wrote:
Vamsi Krishna Davuluri writes:
The priority is on sending the docs to cups-pdf for conversion and then
talking to Moodle for teacher review. It is a good idea
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Albert Cahalan acaha...@gmail.com wrote:
That sounds like a printer that students aren't allowed to use.
Correct! But may be used seldom, as a special case, prize, etc. And
teachers _are_ allowed to print -- while there's a good chance, the
computers there are
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 04:44:33AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
Sending the docs to cups-pdf for conversion and then talking to Moodle
for teacher review can be done via /usr/bin/lpr,
But that would sidestep the Journal and prevent review of the actual
output (i.e. what it looks like on paper,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-i...@silbe.org wrote:
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 04:44:33AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
Sending the docs to cups-pdf for conversion and then talking to Moodle
for teacher review can be done via /usr/bin/lpr,
But that would
Vamsi Krishna Davuluri writes:
So, talking to Tomeu, we agreed that for Write and Read using
the gtkprint would be best as both support it as a printing API.
The focus on Write and Read is short sighted and may lead
to inflexible solutions.
Now, the current plan is:
1) We do journal
On Sunday 03 May 2009 06:29:26 pm Albert Cahalan wrote:
Vamsi Krishna Davuluri writes:
So, talking to Tomeu, we agreed that for Write and Read using
the gtkprint would be best as both support it as a printing API.
The focus on Write and Read is short sighted and may lead
to inflexible
6 matches
Mail list logo
