Tested on XO-1.5 with os125, patch applied over Record-78.
- Activity tab fine,
- Photo tab fine, capture, fullscreen, playback, but information tab for
the playback image had preview overlaying Tags (white box) and Date,
- Record tab fine, capture, fullscreen, playback, same problem as above
El Wed, 09-06-2010 a las 11:39 +1000, James Cameron escribió:
* There was probably a reason why it moved them off screen instead of**
hiding them. Do you have any idea what it is?** **
b480c7ed2e4848f33f11f9df27f6cb34e7c76b82 was a move of elements** offscreen
instead of hiding, committed
On 8 June 2010 23:25, Anish Mangal anishmangal2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I did reply to your mail earlier today, I'll paste my comments here ...
Still unanswered questions from my last mail:
There was probably a reason why it moved them off screen instead of hiding
them.
Do you have any
This comment in ui.py explains why
#we move offscreen to resize or else we get flashes on screen,
and setting hide() doesn't allow resize moves
OK.
So this patch introduces some flashing ?
[It looks like my recent post regarding this matter was not slipped into
this thread nicely
From: anishmangal2002 anishmangal2...@gmail.com
How the existing UI works:
The record UI consists of many windows/widgets. In a particular
mode or view, it displays and resizes the widgets appropriate for that
view and tries to hide the other windows by moving them off-screen.
Now, on sugar-0.88
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:22:19AM +0530, anishmangal2...@gmail.com wrote:
From: anishmangal2002 anishmangal2...@gmail.com
How the existing UI works:
The record UI consists of many windows/widgets. In a particular
mode or view, it displays and resizes the widgets appropriate for that
view
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 07:45:06PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:22:19AM +0530, anishmangal2...@gmail.com wrote:
From: anishmangal2002 anishmangal2...@gmail.com
How the existing UI works:
The record UI consists of many windows/widgets. In a particular
mode or
El Tue, 08-06-2010 a las 19:45 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
Patch looks good for me, if it doesn't beat Daniel's release plans,
I guess we can commit (you are in commiters list) it and bump new Record
release (you can also release new version).
Fantastic. Anish, can you commit and provide a
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 05:56:22PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
El Tue, 08-06-2010 a las 19:45 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
Patch looks good for me, if it doesn't beat Daniel's release plans,
I guess we can commit (you are in commiters list) it and bump new Record
release (you can also
On 8 June 2010 13:52, anishmangal2...@gmail.com wrote:
Fix description:
The patch works by hiding or resizing (to size 1px by 1px) the
widgets not required in a particular view/mode. The updateVideoComponents
method has been modified to hide the widgets not required in a
particular view.
There was probably a reason why it moved them off screen instead of
hiding them. Do you have any idea what it is?
b480c7ed2e4848f33f11f9df27f6cb34e7c76b82 was a move of elements
offscreen instead of hiding, committed 2007-08-31 by erikb, there's no
explanation given, and the SVN repository
james wrote:
There was probably a reason why it moved them off screen instead of
hiding them. Do you have any idea what it is?
b480c7ed2e4848f33f11f9df27f6cb34e7c76b82 was a move of elements
offscreen instead of hiding, committed 2007-08-31 by erikb, there's no
explanation given,
El Wed, 09-06-2010 a las 11:39 +1000, James Cameron escribió:
There was probably a reason why it moved them off screen instead of
hiding them. Do you have any idea what it is?
b480c7ed2e4848f33f11f9df27f6cb34e7c76b82 was a move of elements
offscreen instead of hiding, committed 2007-08-31
Hi,
I did reply to your mail earlier today, I'll paste my comments here ...
Still unanswered questions from my last mail:
There was probably a reason why it moved them off screen instead of hiding
them.
Do you have any idea what it is?
This comment in ui.py explains why
#we move
14 matches
Mail list logo
