On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
the general approach - just a few small comments inline.
Thanks! There's a patch in reply, and a few comments from me here...
+ def remove_window_by_xid(self, xid):
+ Remove a window from the windows
On 02/17/2011 01:21 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de wrote:
the general approach - just a few small comments inline.
Thanks! There's a patch in reply, and a few comments from me here...
+def remove_window_by_xid(self,
Pushed as dc8f6ed7852f919fe7123d458706fb82430257e9
Sascha gave his formal bless, too.
Regards,
Simon
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 02/12/2011 05:27 PM, martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Martin Langhoffmar...@laptop.org
Now activities have a stack of windows (Activity._windows). The
lowest still-valid window in the stack is considered the main window.
When a window is closed, the shell finds what activity had that
From: Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org
Now activities have a stack of windows (Activity._windows). The
lowest still-valid window in the stack is considered the main window.
When a window is closed, the shell finds what activity had that window,
tells it to remove it from its stack. If that was
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 2:09 PM, martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/src/jarabe/model/shell.py b/src/jarabe/model/shell.py
index 661e370..bd7e367 100644
I'd like to recall this particular patch. Apologies, posted the wrong version.
cheers,
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
6 matches
Mail list logo