>>
>> Wonder if that's a problem for SugarLabs? If a packager wants to
>> include an activity that is not part of the stable release of Sugar
>> that they are shipping, isn't that their choice?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tomeu
>>
>
&
Sugar
> that they are shipping, isn't that their choice?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tomeu
Maybe that is right. But it is good to mark it like that. So packagers
have the choice.
[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Terminal v25 (attention distro managers!!)
The me
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 22:55, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Wade Brainerd wrote:
>> Yeah, v24 introduced tabs. v25 is a bugfix of v24.
>
> Hmmm, it has been packaged for Fedora 11 already. And F11 should only
> contain Sucrose 0.84. Please make clear what Sucrose version it is for
> when you announc
Wade Brainerd wrote:
> Yeah, v24 introduced tabs. v25 is a bugfix of v24.
Hmmm, it has been packaged for Fedora 11 already. And F11 should only
contain Sucrose 0.84. Please make clear what Sucrose version it is for
when you announce new releases - since otherwise packagers pick it up
and put i
Yeah, v24 introduced tabs. v25 is a bugfix of v24.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Wade Brainerd wrote:
>
>> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4043
>>
>> Please update to this new version ASAP. Terminal v24 will not start
>> properly
>> on a clean insta
Wade Brainerd wrote:
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4043
>
> Please update to this new version ASAP. Terminal v24 will not start properly
> on a clean install of Sugar, when the terminalrc file is not present!
>
> == Bundle ==
>
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4043
Please update to this new version ASAP. Terminal v24 will not start properly
on a clean install of Sugar, when the terminalrc file is not present!
== Bundle ==
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/downloads/latest/4043
== Source ==
7 matches
Mail list logo
