Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-21 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/20/2010 11:10 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 20 12:45:28 +0200 2010: Do you expect only developers of activities in Fructose to follow that process (documented on the Development Team/Release [1] page on the wiki) or others as well? Ideally

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-21 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/21/2010 03:49 AM, Gary Martin wrote: On 20 Sep 2010, at 22:10, Sascha Silbesascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote: Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 20 12:45:28 +0200 2010: Do you expect only developers of activities in Fructose to follow that process

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/15/2010 04:27 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Wed Sep 15 12:33:30 +0200 2010: Personally I'm moving to the point where if there's not a tarball I won't spend my time packaging it. Yes, I think the effort for uploading a bundle that can be easily

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-20 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 20 12:45:28 +0200 2010: Do you expect only developers of activities in Fructose to follow that process (documented on the Development Team/Release [1] page on the wiki) or others as well? Ideally all of them, as (a) there are not many

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-20 Thread Gary Martin
On 20 Sep 2010, at 22:10, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote: Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 20 12:45:28 +0200 2010: Do you expect only developers of activities in Fructose to follow that process (documented on the Development Team/Release [1] page

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 00:51, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, what is the current status for activity releases in order to include them in

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-15 Thread David Farning
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 00:51, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-15 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200 2010: In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work directly from the git repository. We should not go from the git repository. Either use the .xo or a tarball. Why? And who is we in this case?

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-15 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Gary Martin's message of Wed Sep 15 01:58:07 +0200 2010: [activity release tarballs] I've been uploading me since Bernie kindly un blocked my shell account, though I totally understand why others might not manage this workflow, there's already many hoops to jump though for a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/15/2010 01:58 AM, Gary Martin wrote: On 14 Sep 2010, at 15:14, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de wrote: Thanks David and Walter for the feedback, On 09/14/2010 04:09 PM, Walter Bender wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farningdfarn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/15/2010 10:41 AM, David Farning wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 00:51, Jonas Smedegaardd...@jones.dk wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/14/2010 11:15 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Walter Benderwalter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farningdfarn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi Peter, thanks for your feedback. On 09/14/2010 11:19 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, what is the current status for activity releases in order to include them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:25:57AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 00:51, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, what is the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-15 Thread David Farning
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote: Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200 2010: In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work directly from the git repository. We should not go from

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/15/2010 11:47 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote: Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200 2010: In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work directly from the git repository. We should not go from the git repository. Either use the .xo or a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 07:28:05AM -0500, David Farning wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote: Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200 2010: In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-15 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/15/2010 03:22 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 07:28:05AM -0500, David Farning wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote: Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200 2010: In the .deb

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-15 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from David Farning's message of Wed Sep 15 14:28:05 +0200 2010: We should not go from the git repository. Either use the .xo or a tarball. For the entire 'why' I will have to refer you to the the Debain mailing lists. /me ducks The short answer is Debian packaging is premised on

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-14 Thread David Farning
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, what is the current status for activity releases in order to include them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs or did you switch over to construct the rpms from the .xo? For example the latest

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-14 Thread Walter Bender
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, what is the current status for activity releases in order to include them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs or did

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-14 Thread Simon Schampijer
Thanks David and Walter for the feedback, On 09/14/2010 04:09 PM, Walter Bender wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farningdfarn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, what is the current status for activity releases

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-14 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, what is the current status for activity releases in order

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-14 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, what is the current status for activity releases in order to include them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs or did you switch over to construct the rpms from the .xo? For example the latest

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-14 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 14.09.2010, at 23:15, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work directly from

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-14 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 14.09.2010, at 23:15, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote: In the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-14 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 15.09.2010, at 00:07, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: And (from your other msg) why do you want both zip (xo) and tar balls? I just want sure source code only tarfiles. I presume for a.sl.o there's a need for

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, what is the current status for activity releases in order to include them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs or did you switch

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

2010-09-14 Thread Gary Martin
On 14 Sep 2010, at 15:14, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Thanks David and Walter for the feedback, On 09/14/2010 04:09 PM, Walter Bender wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farningdfarn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon