On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Iain Brown Douglas
wrote:
> I have run (on Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4)
>
> sudo yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing sugar*
>
> In brief testing all good, no regressions seen - brief testing only, as
> this is not on a *clean* install.
Brilliant, and RC1
I have run (on Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4)
sudo yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing sugar*
In brief testing all good, no regressions seen - brief testing only, as
this is not on a *clean* install.
Iain
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 07:16 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> I think the spec was fix
I am very sorry, Peter, that I did not realise that you had applied a
patch within 75 minutes of being made aware of it. Thank you for that.
More than one could expect from the most dedicated maintainer - a pity
you did not say though!
I mistakenly thought that your reply was, "Before my time, Gu
> Assertion, limited testing, please contradict:
> Speak, "Ask robot a question" is broken in SoaS 1.00 >
1.00? What?
> It has been broken for several years, but is not seen because a Software
> update has been available which provides bot/ and functionality of "Ask
> robot a question".
It tends
I think the spec was fixed by peter in sugar-speak 48-2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167791
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Iain Brown Douglas <
i...@browndouglas.plus.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 14:56 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:09 +000
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 14:56 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:09 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Sebastian Silva
> > wrote:
> > > btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no?
> >
> > No, it's not, it happens all the time.
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:09 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Sebastian Silva
> wrote:
> > btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no?
>
> No, it's not, it happens all the time. It might be that it breaks in
> certain situations, isn't re-distributab
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Sebastian Silva
wrote:
> btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no?
No, it's not, it happens all the time. It might be that it breaks in
certain situations, isn't re-distributable, causes problems the
upstream maintainer won't fix or any number o
Ahh, sorry, wrong Sebastian!
Gonzalo
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Sebastian Silva
wrote:
> So ask Sebastian Dzallas why he removed my contribution!
> Sebastian Silva
> http://somosazucar.org/
>
>
>
> 2014-11-25 7:50 GMT-05:00 Gonzalo Odiard :
> > Yes, but that is what this patch do, right?
So ask Sebastian Dzallas why he removed my contribution!
Sebastian Silva
http://somosazucar.org/
2014-11-25 7:50 GMT-05:00 Gonzalo Odiard :
> Yes, but that is what this patch do, right?
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198
>
>
Yes, but that is what this patch do, right?
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Sebastian Silva
wrote:
> btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no?
> Sebastian Silva
> http://som
btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no?
Sebastian Silva
http://somosazucar.org/
2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva :
> I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed.
> It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as deployed in Peru.
> I was not
I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed.
It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as deployed in Peru.
I was not aware of responsible for the removed functionality nor was I
aware of any bugs related to it or performance.
Please add it back
Sebastian Silva
http://
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
>> wrote:
>> > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted.
>> > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
> wrote:
> > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted.
> > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm.
>
> It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted.
> I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm.
It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously
working. The question is what does it do, and why when Speak has bee
On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 13:10 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted.
> I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm.
>
I have successfully built Speak (twice in same environment) with a
sugar-speak.spec changed as per attached patch.
Speak works fin
You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted.
I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm.
Gonzalo
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Iain Brown Douglas <
i...@browndouglas.plus.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 12:28 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:15
On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 12:28 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:15 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 00:52 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> > >
> > > The folder bot/ and its contents were not in the
> > > Speak.activity folder.
On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:15 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 00:52 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> >
> > The folder bot/ and its contents were not in the
> > Speak.activity folder.
> >
> > I deleted /usr/share/sugar/activities/Speak.a
On 23.11.2014, at 20:25, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 16:16 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>> On 22.11.2014, at 15:15, Jean THIERY wrote:
>>>
>>> EToys-116 displays
>>> « Cannot find image file: squeak, did you run 'initsqueak -m'? »
>>> After clicking on this message,
>
On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 16:16 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> > On 22.11.2014, at 15:15, Jean THIERY wrote:
> >
> > EToys-116 displays
> > « Cannot find image file: squeak, did you run 'initsqueak -m'? »
> > After clicking on this message,
> > the screen is filled by cars and is not usable.
>
> T
On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 00:52 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
> The folder bot/ and its contents were not in the
> Speak.activity folder.
>
> I deleted /usr/share/sugar/activities/Speak.activity/
> I re-installed Speak by importing speak-48.xo with a U
> On 22.11.2014, at 15:15, Jean THIERY wrote:
>
> EToys-116 displays
> « Cannot find image file: squeak, did you run 'initsqueak -m'? »
> After clicking on this message,
> the screen is filled by cars and is not usable.
That looks weird ... does it work if you run "etoys" from the Terminal acti
On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 00:52 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
> can you uninstall the activity again, and install the activity using
> the rpm?
> The rpm should be named sugar-speak
I am unfamiliar with the process, and (over-) aware of time constraints.
Working on SoaS, in Terminal Activity, I wa
>
>
> The folder bot/ and its contents were not in the Speak.activity folder.
>
> I deleted /usr/share/sugar/activities/Speak.activity/
> I re-installed Speak by importing speak-48.xo with a USB stick.
> Alice is now running complete with brain.
>
Ok, that confirms the .xo is ok,
can you uninstall
On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 16:06 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 10:06 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
> Hi Gonzalo,
> >
> > About Speak, please check if there are a file bot/alice.brn in the
> > activity directory.
>
>
> At first sight I do not see the folder bot/
The folde
27 matches
Mail list logo
