Hi James,
I tried downloading the file from my mirror (sgp1.old.aslo.cf) and it
worked a charm. The Arrnet http mirror is more than 1 month old! Maybe
change your code (just for this run) to use the address of my mirror
instead of download.sugarlabs.org so you don't get arrnet. Stats (now
Thanks, yes, the mirror is obviously out of date, I can tell, but why
does download.sugarlabs.org persist in suggesting it to (a) my IP in
Australia, and (b) localhost, itself?!
I've also changed the code I'm using to rely on disk cache
http://dev.laptop.org/~quozl/z/1XGkQF.txt
and copied the
Now, I'm not sure if Gonzalo's link for words-21 is correct:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Sugarlabs/0.102
This is hindering olpc-os-builder. ;-) I don't yet know how to
workaround it short of duplicating Gonzalo's activity list page.
The link is ok.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
Now, I'm not sure if Gonzalo's link for words-21 is correct:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Sugarlabs/0.102
This is hindering olpc-os-builder. ;-) I don't yet know how to
workaround it short of duplicating
I have a question
Why sugarlabs no use sunjammer.sugarlabs.org for download activities? and
Just link to a mirror?
Ignacio Rodríguez
2014-08-11 11:17 GMT-03:00 Frederick Grose fgr...@sugarlabs.org:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
Now, I'm not
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:17:41AM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Gonzalo Odiard [1]godi...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
Now, I'm not sure if Gonzalo's link for words-21 is correct:
[2]http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Sugarlabs/0.102
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:21:02AM -0300, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote:
I have a question
Why sugarlabs no use sunjammer.sugarlabs.org for download
activities? and Just link to a mirror?
I agree; the sugar_activity_group.url for the Sugar Labs builds could
refer to a URL at sugarlabs.org rather
+rralcala
On 08/11/2014 03:48 AM, Sam P. wrote:
Hi James,
I tried downloading the file from my mirror (sgp1.old.aslo.cf
http://sgp1.old.aslo.cf) and it worked a charm. The Arrnet http
mirror is more than 1 month old! Maybe change your code (just for this
run) to use the address of my
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:54:32PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
+rralcala
On 08/11/2014 03:48 AM, Sam P. wrote:
Hi James,
I tried downloading the file from my mirror (sgp1.old.aslo.cf
http://sgp1.old.aslo.cf) and it worked a charm. The Arrnet http
mirror is more than 1 month old!
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 06:37:43PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On 08/09/2014 06:26 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On 08/09/2014 06:16 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
(dropping a bunch of redundant addresses from the cc list)
I noticed a strange pattern: all the rsync mirrors appear to be
Our CDN works like this:
1. mirmon checks periodically if mirrors are responding and up to date
2. clients send queries to download.sugarlabs.org (sunjammer)
3. mod_mirrorbrain in apache uses geoip to find the closest *WORKING* mirror
4. apache sends back a 302 redirect to the chosen mirror
(dropping a bunch of redundant addresses from the cc list)
I noticed a strange pattern: all the rsync mirrors appear to be broken,
but in fact they're all responsive and up to date (the timestamp.txt
file is fresh).
Looks like Mirmon's health check over rsync is broken in some way.
On
On 08/09/2014 06:16 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
(dropping a bunch of redundant addresses from the cc list)
I noticed a strange pattern: all the rsync mirrors appear to be broken,
but in fact they're all responsive and up to date (the timestamp.txt
file is fresh).
Looks like Mirmon's
On 08/09/2014 06:26 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On 08/09/2014 06:16 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
(dropping a bunch of redundant addresses from the cc list)
I noticed a strange pattern: all the rsync mirrors appear to be broken,
but in fact they're all responsive and up to date (the
Thanks Bernie!
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On 08/09/2014 06:26 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On 08/09/2014 06:16 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
(dropping a bunch of redundant addresses from the cc list)
I noticed a strange pattern: all the
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Sam Parkinson sam.parkins...@gmail.com
wrote:
We really should perge the mirrors list of dead mirrors.
http://mirrors.sugarlabs.org
+1, I was thinking more like disabling temporarily those who haven't been
working since a few days.
Maybe we should contact
Sebastian, did you remember in sugar camp?
We got the same problem..
You fixed it?
Or that was automatic?
Ignacio Rodríguez
2014-08-06 18:44 GMT-03:00 Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org:
Hi,
I have experienced the same thing. Not sure it was the same mirror.
Regards,
Sebastian
We really should perge the mirrors list of dead mirrors.
http://mirrors.sugarlabs.org
Maybe we should contact arrnet (the one in question) - they might fix it if
you ask nicely :)
I will try to setup a mirror myself - I have like 1tb unused internet on my
new aslo server (digitalocean in
18 matches
Mail list logo
