Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Tidying up; images from 2010 to 2012

Thanks. There were no resistance factors, but there were people leaving Sugar Labs [1] resulting us jointly and severally not keeping our workspace clean. I've no idea if backups are happening, but the other system administrators probably can answer that. I doubt they'll see the question given

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Tidying up; images from 2010 to 2012

The benefits of keeping old data around that you currently see no use for, is that in the future you may want to use the data for some purpose, after all. And data storage is cheap. That being said, I have no objection to deleting them. I'm not sure anyone would notice if they just go. If

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Tidying up; images from 2010 to 2012

If the factors are now tackled then it can be taken one step forward and it's a good option. On Sat, 8 Dec, 2018, 21:06 Alex Perez Assuming there _was_ a resistance factor is probably not a good idea :) > I'm not really sure why it matters, even if there was one, either. > > Anmol Mishra >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Tidying up; images from 2010 to 2012

Assuming there _was_ a resistance factor is probably not a good idea :) I'm not really sure why it matters, even if there was one, either. Anmol Mishra December 8, 2018 at 6:15 AM I would like to ask If these images are from 2010-2012, why weren't they

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Tidying up; images from 2010 to 2012

I would like to ask If these images are from 2010-2012, why weren't they deleted earlier? I'm asking this to get the resistance factors that were imposed earlier on deletion in maybe 2016-current. On Sat, 8 Dec, 2018, 10:33 James Cameron Yes. > > Harms are misdirection of users and filesystem

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Tidying up; images from 2010 to 2012

On 08/12/2018 10.35, James Cameron wrote: Several very old files are on the Sugar Labs download server; perhaps they should be removed; discuss? 1. the Dextrose fork, based on Fedora 11, sunjammer:/upload/dextrose (71 GB) http://download.sugarlabs.org/dextrose/ +1 to deleting the images,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Tidying up; images from 2010 to 2012

G'day. I agree that they should be removed. On Sat, Dec 8, 2018, 10:33 AM James Cameron Harms are misdirection of users and filesystem size. Any backlinks to these images (maybe on our wiki) will also have to be updated / removed. Thanks Rahul Bothra

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Tidying up; images from 2010 to 2012

Yes. Harms are misdirection of users and filesystem size. Further subdividing; - on the misdirection, the images have bugs that have been fixed, such as since mitigated zero-day vulnerabilities. - on the size, they increased time cost of backups or filesystem maintenance on the servers.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Tidying up; images from 2010 to 2012

I don't see the harm in leaving old stuff lying around if the disk has plenty of room. Surely there's more important things to do :) ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Tidying up; images from 2010 to 2012

61% -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Tidying up; images from 2010 to 2012

What % of the server disk space is used? ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel