Re: [Sugar-devel] [wiki bug] Roadmap Sugar Labs - Ambiguity detected on how to make Decisions

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:14:45PM -0500, Laura Vargas wrote: > > 2017-05-08 15:20 GMT-05:00 James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org>: > > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:28:00AM -0500, Laura Vargas wrote: > > 2017-05-07 21:59 GMT-05:00 James Cameron <[1][2]qu...@laptop.org>: > > > Please

Re: [Sugar-devel] [wiki bug] Roadmap Sugar Labs - Ambiguity detected on how to make Decisions

2017-05-08 15:20 GMT-05:00 James Cameron : > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:28:00AM -0500, Laura Vargas wrote: > > 2017-05-07 21:59 GMT-05:00 James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org>: > > > Please instead build trust. > > > > Interesting point of view. Still, please elaborate in this > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [wiki bug] Roadmap Sugar Labs - Ambiguity detected on how to make Decisions

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:28:00AM -0500, Laura Vargas wrote: > 2017-05-07 21:59 GMT-05:00 James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org>: > > Please instead build trust. > > Interesting point of view. Still, please elaborate in this > suggestion. How to achieve this? As there is only one board member

Re: [Sugar-devel] [wiki bug] Roadmap Sugar Labs - Ambiguity detected on how to make Decisions

2017-05-07 21:59 GMT-05:00 James Cameron : > G'day Laura, > > No, I don't think your suggestion is the best fix. It can and should > be much simpler. > > Words spoken (or typed) during a meeting do not become a motion until > there exists both a proposer and seconder from among

Re: [Sugar-devel] [wiki bug] Roadmap Sugar Labs - Ambiguity detected on how to make Decisions

G'day Laura, No, I don't think your suggestion is the best fix. It can and should be much simpler. Words spoken (or typed) during a meeting do not become a motion until there exists both a proposer and seconder from among the members of the oversight board. You should instead welcome

Re: [Sugar-devel] [wiki bug] Roadmap Sugar Labs - Ambiguity detected on how to make Decisions

Sorry for the cross-posting, Sebastian just made me realize how annoying that could be. Also, would like to correct the text as follows: Option A: "Sugar Labs governance model allows members of the project not on the SLOB to post motions *only *by email sending the proposed text to SLOBs,

[Sugar-devel] [wiki bug] Roadmap Sugar Labs - Ambiguity detected on how to make Decisions

Hola a todos! During yesterday's meeting there was evident confusion among members regarding Sugar Labs decision-making process. Specifically, we had not clear if non-SLOBs members were welcome or not to propose motions during a meeting. I propose to correct the third sentence of the Decisions