Re: [Sugar-devel] .rpms vs .xos for Activity packaging

2009-01-13 Thread Luke Faraone
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all, Maybe its only my peculiar desire (to talk about packaging issues:), but... Since I'm trying support sugar in Gentoo/ALILinux/Mandriva, I don't know how to treat honey activities: - package them all and

Re: [Sugar-devel] .rpms vs .xos for Activity packaging

2009-01-12 Thread luke
On 1/12/09, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:43:01PM -0500, l...@faraone.cc wrote: On 1/11/09, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all, Some thought after reading https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Sugar_on_Fedora:_RPMs_or_.xos%3F Maybe

Re: [Sugar-devel] .rpms vs .xos for Activity packaging

2009-01-12 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 12.01.2009, at 17:44, l...@faraone.cc wrote: On 1/12/09, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:43:01PM -0500, l...@faraone.cc wrote: On 1/11/09, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all, Some thought after reading

Re: [Sugar-devel] .rpms vs .xos for Activity packaging

2009-01-12 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:44:52AM -0500, l...@faraone.cc wrote: On 1/12/09, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:43:01PM -0500, l...@faraone.cc wrote: On 1/11/09, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all,

Re: [Sugar-devel] .rpms vs .xos for Activity packaging

2009-01-12 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:44:52AM -0500, l...@faraone.cc wrote: On 1/12/09, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:43:01PM -0500, l...@faraone.cc wrote: On 1/11/09, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all, Some thought after reading