Hello,
here is an initial schedule for 0.100
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Roadmap
Notes:
* Still unclear if it's going to be 0.100 or 1.0. We should probably
decide after we know what the focus of the release is going to be.
* I have not allocated dates for unstable tarballs. Is it
Thanks for your work... Will be good to start scheduling the next Sugar
major release.
I'm glad because I have been waiting to sinc the documentation team
schedule.
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Documentation_Team/Notes/1.0#Schedule
Best regards,
Daniel.
2013/3/27 Daniel Narvaez
IMHO, Feature should not be frozen at the same time than String, UI and ABI
Gonzalo
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
here is an initial schedule for 0.100
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Roadmap
Notes:
* Still unclear if it's going
Can you elaborate on the reason? Refining features might require
breaking String/UI/ABI?
On 27 March 2013 15:30, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
IMHO, Feature should not be frozen at the same time than String, UI and ABI
Gonzalo
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Daniel Narvaez
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Can you elaborate on the reason? Refining features might require
breaking String/UI/ABI?
Usually, we have a date to decide when a Feature is accepted or should be
in the next cycle,
but after that, can be included
On 27 March 2013 15:43, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Usually, we have a date to decide when a Feature is accepted or should be in
the next cycle,
but after that, can be included small changes.
You are probably referring the to feature acceptance deadline here.
Feature freeze does
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
On 27 March 2013 15:43, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Usually, we have a date to decide when a Feature is accepted or should
be in
the next cycle,
but after that, can be included small changes.
You are
On 27 March 2013 16:04, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Ok. Then, when should be feature acceptance deadline?
Yeah, that's something I'm stiill thinking about.
As maintainers requested in other threads, it might make sense to try
and narrow the focus of this release and join forces on
The acceptance deadline used to be very near to freeze (one month
earlier). But if we want to narrow the release focus, perhaps it's
good to have this discussion as soon as possible...
+1
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Hi all.
I would request to include the following features for the next release
cycle ::
a)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection
* The UI workflow was heavily reviewed by Gary, and all the changes
incorporated.
* The feature is completely GTK3-ported, and ready for
Hi Ajay,
Should be good you provide patches we can apply on actual sugar
as soon as possible.
Honestly, I am worried about the Multiple Selection. Is a really big change.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Ajay Garg a...@activitycentral.comwrote:
Hi all.
I would request to include the
On 27 March 2013 16:31, Ajay Garg a...@activitycentral.com wrote:
b)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support
* The feature is completely GTK3-ported, and ready for inclusion.
Has it been ported to network manager 0.9?
The Benefit to Sugar section is a bit terse.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi Ajay,
Should be good you provide patches we can apply on actual sugar
as soon as possible.
Great !!!
I will float the patch by this weekend (after duly testing it on
sugar-build on F18).
Honestly, I am worried
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 March 2013 16:31, Ajay Garg a...@activitycentral.com wrote:
b)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support
* The feature is completely GTK3-ported, and ready for inclusion.
Has it
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 March 2013 16:31, Ajay Garg a...@activitycentral.com wrote:
b)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support
* The feature is completely GTK3-ported, and ready for inclusion.
Has it been
On 03/27/2013 01:36 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
here is an initial schedule for 0.100
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Roadmap
Notes:
* Still unclear if it's going to be 0.100 or 1.0. We should probably
decide after we know what the focus of the release is going to be.
That sounds
On 27 March 2013 16:31, Ajay Garg a...@activitycentral.com wrote:
b)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support
* The feature is completely GTK3-ported, and ready for inclusion.
This seems to a self contained control panel extension right? If so
perhaps it should be
On 27 March 2013 18:47, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
* I have not allocated dates for unstable tarballs. Is it actually
worth spending time building those? Is anyone using them?
So far, Fedora has been picking them up and they made their way into the
OLPC images that way. It
On 03/27/2013 06:58 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 27 March 2013 18:47, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
* I have not allocated dates for unstable tarballs. Is it actually
worth spending time building those? Is anyone using them?
So far, Fedora has been picking them up and they made
On 27 March 2013 19:05, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 03/27/2013 06:58 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 27 March 2013 18:47, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
* I have not allocated dates for unstable tarballs. Is it actually
worth spending time building those? Is
On 27 Mar 2013 17:55, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 March 2013 16:31, Ajay Garg a...@activitycentral.com wrote:
b)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support
* The feature is completely GTK3-ported, and ready for inclusion.
This seems to a
On 27 Mar 2013 17:58, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 March 2013 18:47, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
* I have not allocated dates for unstable tarballs. Is it actually
worth spending time building those? Is anyone using them?
So far, Fedora has been
The 3G database support feature, is only take the data to put in the fields
of already existing modem support from the data xml files already used by
Gnome.
Is not a big change, and help to the users of modems.
Also, already received feedback the last cycle, I think is safe try to land
it.
Ok, we seem to have some consensus that this could/should land. I'm
just trying to be defensive about adding features to mantain :)
On 27 March 2013 20:30, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
The 3G database support feature, is only take the data to put in the fields
of already existing
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, we seem to have some consensus that this could/should land. I'm
just trying to be defensive about adding features to mantain :)
Smart boy ;)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Added unstable releases dates.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
26 matches
Mail list logo
