Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 18:20, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote: Excerpts from Tomeu Vizoso's message of Thu Aug 05 09:04:44 +0200 2010: The problem with this is that often the owner is not around when needed. If gitorious doesn't have more sofisticated rights management

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-21 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Tomeu Vizoso's message of Thu Aug 05 09:04:44 +0200 2010: The problem with this is that often the owner is not around when needed. If gitorious doesn't have more sofisticated rights management I propose creating a group account and sharing the password between several people.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 02:20, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote: On 6 Aug 2010, at 13:35, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: I was just throwing in the idea here. I will bother you further only once I have a realistic plan in mind (and confidence in the ability to execute it

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 07:19, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 09:05:24AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 01:47, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote: On 6 Aug 2010, at 00:20, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 05, 2010

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH]Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-09 Thread Art Hunkins
Once you discover *where* to go to file a bug report, it is rather easy to file one IMO. My observation is that the filing procedure is somewhat hidden in arcane terminology. Less technically astute persons of interest such as myself can get lost and discouraged when the path is not made plain

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-08 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 09:05:24AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 01:47, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote: On 6 Aug 2010, at 00:20, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 09:06:03AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Another option is having

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-07 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On 6 Aug 2010, at 13:35, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: I was just throwing in the idea here. I will bother you further only once I have a realistic plan in mind (and confidence in the ability to execute it with our limited resources) :) Sorry if I sounded harsh, I wanted to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 01:47, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote: On 6 Aug 2010, at 00:20, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 09:06:03AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Another option is having some script that adds committers to all sugar core modules in one

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-06 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Yeah, I think we need to look into merging core in a single repository. At the end it's basically the same problem we find again and again: we spend days-person discussing some big changes, eventually may reach an

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:51, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Yeah, I think we need to look into merging core in a single repository. At the end it's basically the same problem we find again and again: we

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 21:41, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: Excerpts from Tomeu Vizoso's message of Wed Aug 04 20:03:50 +0200 2010: Don't have permissions to push to sugar-tools, gitorious should grow a better way to add committers. erikos (owner of both the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 09:04, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 21:41, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: Excerpts from Tomeu Vizoso's message of Wed Aug 04 20:03:50 +0200 2010: Don't have permissions to push to sugar-tools, gitorious should

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-05 Thread Tim McNamara
On 6 August 2010 11:20, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 09:06:03AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Another option is having some script that adds committers to all sugar core modules in one go, that would be similar to what GNOME does. There are too many core

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-05 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On 6 Aug 2010, at 00:20, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 09:06:03AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Another option is having some script that adds committers to all sugar core modules in one go, that would be similar to what GNOME does. There are too many core