On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On the negative side, gobject-introspection cross compilation still sounds
like a mess
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592311
I worked on that code for a while at litl. Probably the best bet is
to not try
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 13 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
I was curious about what it would take to port enough of the GNOME
libraries to android to be able to run the current Sugar
implementation there. I'm not planning to work on it, but I thought it
would be useful to post some notes on what I found.
At the time, the android NDK was rather eccentric, which made
cross-compilation needlessly difficult. And the GTK stack is very
deep, there are a lot of dependencies. My understanding is that the
NDK has been improved since then, and is a little more compatible. I
wouldn't say speed is the main
Maybe something to discuss with the GNOME crowd coming to the Hackfest this
weekend at Twine.
-walter
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:58 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.orgwrote:
At the time, the android NDK was rather eccentric, which made
cross-compilation needlessly difficult. And the GTK
The situation is probably improved since you tried. Collabora has been
working on it a lot and parts of their work seems to be landing upstream.
For example glib landed very recently
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689223
I agree that it would be worth revisiting.
On 16 April 2013
On the negative side, gobject-introspection cross compilation still sounds
like a mess
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592311
On 17 April 2013 01:11, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
The situation is probably improved since you tried. Collabora has been
working on it a lot
Hello,
I was curious about what it would take to port enough of the GNOME
libraries to android to be able to run the current Sugar implementation
there. I'm not planning to work on it, but I thought it would be useful to
post some notes on what I found.
The way people are building android
7 matches
Mail list logo