Re: [Sugar-devel] Formal question regarding Feature Policy

2014-03-06 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Probably [FEATURE] is enough. Will have a Design discussion anyway. Remember the feature wiki page do not mean will be implemented by magic, somebody need take responsibility of do the work. Also, we will not land more features for 0.102, see our schedule [1] Gonzalo [1]

Re: [Sugar-devel] Formal question regarding Feature Policy

2014-03-06 Thread Christian Stroetmann
Hi Gonzalo Before any complaints hit the the mailing list I prefer to ask twice. In this case the question is related with the paragraph 'Propose a feature for addition into the release cycle', point 2 of the webpage Features/Policy that says: If your feature adds UI or changes the current UI

Re: [Sugar-devel] Formal question regarding Feature Policy

2014-03-06 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Christian Stroetmann stroetm...@ontolab.com wrote: Hi Gonzalo Before any complaints hit the the mailing list I prefer to ask twice. In this case the question is related with the paragraph 'Propose a feature for addition into the release cycle', point 2 of

[Sugar-devel] Formal question regarding Feature Policy

2014-03-05 Thread Christian Stroetmann
Aloha Already some days ago I read the webpage about the Feature Policy following one of the hints of Gonzalo Odiard. Now I have a little question. On the webpage Feature Policy it is written something about what has to be written in the subject field of related e-mails. So, if somebody