And are the implementations not prone to modification?
As in we could specify a particular #print_port to bypass them?
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Vamsi Krishna Davuluri
vamsi.davul...@gmail.com wrote:
The link you gave didn't work, so I checked this page
True enough, but I hadn't been talking about printing from activities
directly at all for the last half of the mails. :
But for even CUPS to act as a server and accept incoming requests, it would
have to excercise freedom to one port atleast, but write a bit of a code so
that it accepts requests
Ah, that was the thing I had not understood with the extra credits that were
given. I had thought that functionality had to be added to each desktop so
it would act as a print server. sorry.
Clarify a few things for me :
What exactly was required/meant from/by a print server?
I was in the opinion
2009/3/18 Vamsi Krishna Davuluri vamsi.davul...@gmail.com
Clarify a few things for me :
What exactly was required/meant from/by a print server?
I was in the opinion that each laptop was supposed to act as server for the
network :P
It seems I misunderstood *you*. That makes sense, it just
Ben, are you going to be mentoring this project?
Or is there a *possible* mentor I can discuss about this on the IRC channel?
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
Vamsi Krishna Davuluri wrote:
Thank you!
I think I'll do what you said, I'll just let every activity
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Vamsi Krishna Davuluri
vamsi.davul...@gmail.com wrote:
After talking to tomeu, and discovering the pygtk print api,(which through
backends interacts with the cups api) I think its okay to just include the
cups api, and then on top of pygtk print (which has
Hello,
A Student trying to get into GSoC here
After a bit of research I have come up with this approach for the mandatory
requirements that a printer would assume to comply.
1)Integration of a printing infrastructure (CUPS ??) into the XO-1 software
images -
pycups is an opensource based
7 matches
Mail list logo
