Re: [Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-16 Thread Walter Bender
Monday is not ideal for me, but unless someone comes up with another date/time, let's do it. -walter On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > 2013/5/15 Walter Bender : >> Shall we schedule something? What would be a good time to do this? I'm >> pretty flexible. > > What about s

Re: [Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-16 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2013/5/15 Walter Bender : > Shall we schedule something? What would be a good time to do this? I'm > pretty flexible. What about same day and hour of previous html meeting? Monday 20 May 2013 - 14:00 UTC -- .. manuq .. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Suga

Re: [Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-15 Thread Walter Bender
Shall we schedule something? What would be a good time to do this? I'm pretty flexible. -walter On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 6:32 PM, William Orr wrote: > I can definitely help triage whenever you have this next meeting, > depending on when it is. > > Daniel Narvaez >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-15 Thread William Orr
I can definitely help triage whenever you have this next meeting, depending on when it is. Daniel Narvaez Tuesday, May 14, 2013 4:39 PM On Tuesday, 14 May 2013, Walter Bender wrote: Might make sense to do one earlier this time to clean up the mess. Especially if a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-14 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On Tuesday, 14 May 2013, Walter Bender wrote: > > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Narvaez > > > wrote: > >> On Tuesday, 14 May 2013, Walter Bender wrote: >>> >>> I think what would really help, independent of where/how we host things, >>> is to instituteA more regular (and inclusive) tr

Re: [Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-14 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Ah! Thanks for posting this, I knew Joel had something like this but I couldn't find it anymore. On Tuesday, 14 May 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > I agree with the need of cleanup the bug database. I have proposed that > several times, > and closed many bugs. One of the best arguments I read about

Re: [Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-14 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
I agree with the need of cleanup the bug database. I have proposed that several times, and closed many bugs. One of the best arguments I read about this topic, is the "bug bankrupcy" description: "*The bug database* is obviously a great thing to have. Bug reports should be complete, accurate, and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-14 Thread Walter Bender
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On Tuesday, 14 May 2013, Walter Bender wrote: >> >> I think what would really help, independent of where/how we host things, >> is to instituteA more regular (and inclusive) triage meetings. I cannot >> think of the last time we had one tha

Re: [Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-14 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On Tuesday, 14 May 2013, Walter Bender wrote: > > I think what would really help, independent of where/how we host things, > is to instituteA more regular (and inclusive) triage meetings. I cannot > think of the last time we had one that was announced on sugar-devel > How did they go when they was

Re: [Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
There seem to be consensus about keeping to use trac, so I went ahead and disabled all the github issue trackers. On Saturday, 11 May 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed people have started to report issues on github. > > https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/issues/27 >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On Sunday, 12 May 2013, William Orr wrote: > > Simon Schampijer >> May 11, 2013 11:55 AM >> Am 11.05.2013 um 16:45 schrieb Daniel Drake: >> >> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Daniel Narvaez >>> wrote: >>> https://github.com/sugarlabs/**sugar-toolkit-gtk3/issue

Re: [Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-11 Thread William Orr
Simon Schampijer May 11, 2013 11:55 AM Am 11.05.2013 um 16:45 schrieb Daniel Drake: On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/issues/27 We should probably decide if we want to keep using trac instead

Re: [Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-11 Thread Simon Schampijer
Am 11.05.2013 um 16:45 schrieb Daniel Drake : > On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/issues/27 >> >> We should probably decide if we want to keep using trac instead and if so >> turn the issue tracker on github off. >> >> L

Re: [Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-11 Thread Daniel Drake
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/issues/27 > > We should probably decide if we want to keep using trac instead and if so > turn the issue tracker on github off. > > Last time we discussed it, the idea was to keep using trac t

[Sugar-devel] Github issue tracking

2013-05-11 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, I noticed people have started to report issues on github. https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/issues/27 We should probably decide if we want to keep using trac instead and if so turn the issue tracker on github off. Last time we discussed it, the idea was to keep using trac